On 14 October 2017 at 09:22, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 10/14/17 11:15 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote: > > ​Because with Flycheck this is already accomplished. Why not work instead >> on things that Emacs lacks?​ There are already far too many duplicated >> packages, leading to duplicated maintenance effort. >> > > See the second part of this comment: https://github.com/flycheck/fl > ycheck/issues/1177#issuecomment-267445833 > > "...I'd rather let Flycheck die if no maintainer was left to work on it > than moving it into Emacs..." > ​It doesn't have to be moved, just as Org was not moved into Emacs, but continues to be maintained externally, and its sources imported. -- https://rrt.sc3d.org