From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Mastro Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Odd block highlighting [master build] Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:49:07 -0700 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474405283 13231 195.159.176.226 (20 Sep 2016 21:01:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 21:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Noam Postavsky , Kaushal Modi To: Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 20 23:01:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bmSAE-0002Ee-Ns for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 23:01:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38059 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmSAB-0007qc-Vw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:01:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43858) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmRys-0007WA-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:49:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmRyq-0001AG-VV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:49:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::230]:33204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmRyq-0001A5-RN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:49:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yw0-x230.google.com with SMTP id i129so21261093ywb.0 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:49:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NED1yIIE89tyR5gq9JKCBilZKz5lDNr1DzbZcTmXOgk=; b=bHIoHFlZHd95+1cifWBrL2LXev0nGn/Q8ID1gA20nonFCyx5h3p+TeZOMYkllf8gsg 2xJXBculcbAoLtcic4qLVxuYamS+3IUuklkPE9MUr9GZlPufr8bFtBecXFZXsvdHTWy4 6h7Icubuhh20wRaIuuf6WruG+y5p3aCSKjBdSeUJBGH/xbIWN9jbkX0WH8hf3L2efHZf r4KbpCM/s2i3galpXcd1xKq5T95nmsM09048L91pv0pkXM2HiFFcppwDmILhXguRm0ds 2S5iyRJuHDodYUbVllZvApD0e9RgshnHrGrmmo1RtruA2f1b1oiA3PoHxvuSbs7qSaiI 64Jg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NED1yIIE89tyR5gq9JKCBilZKz5lDNr1DzbZcTmXOgk=; b=UHOhLxe4iTmxgjTVeOc0EzWWCq3wWFpjVwianE3zYMwyGgUndiILiN47hvlXqty/67 8OpT5eUbmRqzA1gqQh1WF/PJuWJPBXaysIELXnqtfQzQoqr4wh1WxPXlbYl4A5cPBSkS +HVE1mUv8rK2huI+pVmgF281nkTD2ScpCEhtMpduM9B6qPPeID5v0KUQ+z9UzPH1UUx5 uxwh2z2cEaTO43TWtQn/3JWYTCAUqDvxw2yaMjKtde1rxwFMWj0METXIPjhEGUqZsATp GCPRUUpDy/r5vHMPtrvF4NtA65JvgIozjIRwmvqsx/UF9IRKamAtv3kFF+VlDlAE0QBh 77vQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMEBGacrxqDo1bRR0OrWDVjy0Tr0qQksXjhHAn5e0JP4HhqAFZYWQSA1dUpfyY/mVEIVcRz5guCY6rqsQ== X-Received: by 10.13.230.149 with SMTP id p143mr20115285ywe.187.1474404568366; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.37.58.71 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:49:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c05::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207641 Archived-At: Kaushal Modi wrote: > I haven't yet been able to recreate that block highlight. But here I > get a similar highlight on a string, with flyspell mode off. I also > switched from the default major mode verilog-mode to fundamental mode. > And even then I get that highlight. > > Here is the result of C-u C-x =: > > http://i.imgur.com/Nx0hPmX.png > > I do not understand overlays very well, but it looks like verilog-mode > or some minor mode created 5 overlays over the same region, and they > did not get removed even when those modes were disabled. The overlays have a verilog-include-file property so they're most likely coming from verilog-highlight-region (unless some other mode re-uses that property). John