Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> People will choose the names they want for their packages, and that's
> fine -- it's a free world, and aggressively trying to make people change
> the names of their packages isn't only rude, it's counter productive.

Politely discouraging a counter-productive practice such as naming
packages in a confusing way is neither rude nor counter-productive.

Authors are obviously free to name their packages whatever they want,
but that doesn't mean it's a good idea.  Which in the case of eglot it
definitely isn't, because I can't find anything related to "language
servers" or "lsp" with `apropos'.