>
> It is strange that I seem to be unable to find such rules anywhere on
> the Internet, not just in the Unicode Standard text.

I was not able to find the rules, but they definitely exist.

http://वेद.com/en/rigveda/1/38/3 <http://xn--j2b3a4c.com/en/rigveda/1/38/3>
http://वेद.com/en/rigveda/1/34/9 <http://xn--j2b3a4c.com/en/rigveda/1/34/9>
http://वेद.com/en/rigveda/1/48/6 <http://xn--j2b3a4c.com/en/rigveda/1/48/6>

On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 7:53 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 19:49:20 +0530 (IST)
> > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> > From: Madhu <enometh@meer.net>
> >
> > *  Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> <83h761zv0w.fsf@gnu.org>
> > Wrote on Sat, 07 May 2022 10:01:03 +0300
> >
> > >> From: Madhu <enometh@meer.net>
> > >> Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 21:23:50 +0530
> > >>
> > >> The devanagari numerals 1 (#x967) & 3 (#x969) can be combined with
> > >> the svarita (#x951, incorrectly named in unicode as DEVANAGARI
> > >> STRESS SIGN UDATTA) and the anudatta (#x952) to form the 4 different
> > >> accents.
> > >>
> > >> numeral one + anudatta + svarita
> > >> preceding anudatta + numeral three + anudatta + svarita
> > >> numeral one +  anudatta
> > >> numeral three + anudatta + svarita
> > >>
> > >> e.g.  (#x969 #x951 #x952), when composed, the devanagari numeral 3
> > >> should have an anudatta ("line below") and svarita ("vertical line
> > >> above")
> > >
> > > Where are these rules documented?  I don't see them in the latest
> > > Unicode Standard 14.0.
> >
> > I have no idea.  I assumed the rulesfollow from (some defined) rules
> > for composition, but I stopped dealing with unicode for sanskrit (
> > vedic accents) back in 2002 when I saw the direction it was going in.
>
> It is strange that I seem to be unable to find such rules anywhere on
> the Internet, not just in the Unicode Standard text.
>
>