From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?4KS44KSu4KWA4KSwIOCkuOCkv+CkguCkuSBTYW1lZXIgU2luZ2g=?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Not able to display \u110BD and \u110CD in Emacs Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 22:36:01 +0530 Message-ID: References: <83bkwkbfn1.fsf@gnu.org> <837d78bct1.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgk49n9l.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8us9j6p.fsf@gnu.org> <83levnamv1.fsf@gnu.org> <837d779kgx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000625c9205de46c292" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18349"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Madhu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 05 19:18:08 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nmf79-0004YX-T3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 19:18:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43092 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmf78-0004pO-8w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 13:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmevk-0008Uj-WB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 13:06:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]:39754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmevg-0000vn-Vt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 13:06:20 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id x9so3628037qts.6 for ; Thu, 05 May 2022 10:06:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9TkWOzafrrqHOVLdFrm7lozENDQkbh/Rw6rS2um/pSY=; b=m8INc73NvItk7XY0lHKnhuNKdZOIPhFVrfENSAETq461aIpQsoa5oFKJTN+iuKR7HR moTJyZvK6iTVk+EvwNbxA3w+tdKn6fpa+0CAf+E+NQqfzcfPhKUo0BkZre9pN+ZMkObn /3DDLlbIxhzrKQU4DoxVopyRH+mO7um46KIY8yuSxLSDqjJc0AgnwXSmBb8Q1TF6qeyP 5IdFcJSP8aMgyh6GVQfvUsuVWjcEe1CzOhD9ONFskR8iq17Fs0nev9wAEBxN/KVw6IqF npNKEa0GG8fBoeATZbUfhVktS+tEPqxt6hcCqYEdOtJKWavgw55AVp6tV9ZBzQT0hKz2 u+3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9TkWOzafrrqHOVLdFrm7lozENDQkbh/Rw6rS2um/pSY=; b=eJrlQgsJEflfDBSTUocVZWCVBIge8DUmNRp56vhhdu8DMHzqC4J+YXASii/2ebGRyX HWCLczRJTqI+T+9XVOpmqIpb6clsZqlM5rl3Q96zFrQ8L+1SsAGjoBmIweRUHeI4TFYk G0siUBQQer/vp2Q2xK8bOtCqseFaOfbOZi09pNC/y01KtToR3QdZgEDwgnjW85Sj/ws2 aRaz1ueQrpyI3QwLJB9ykHATD81Dk9+7Y0cIcBuOYrho7+2pJO26ynngunHlFu/Yb6H1 mGvmViLZKh9iiSA/d/MjDaxWtXykVWu51+BFK1Zn/EPN+0nlKBbY3QFnmJoKVNFFDNam RpEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5324hRR4wg9BWdaKBfpbTABkybUPHfYBWoowbl+YxKGAJv8rNePx raCzufWsH4h9/j/Lz8ONvVlgZhxg6Xk6oGriTwHJstaHIuQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhxR5ZIdA3/2WLXnkmyZ7JAtWdxgLteqUrkmtxJQbKfHa0zTdsnz5qONru8HcGk7H5IXajGg7IiPI+eycx7uM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1211:b0:2f2:167:55dc with SMTP id y17-20020a05622a121100b002f2016755dcmr24495806qtx.105.1651770373855; Thu, 05 May 2022 10:06:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::832; envelope-from=lumarzeli30@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x832.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:289256 Archived-At: --000000000000625c9205de46c292 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >check the table on the last page of Wikner's >document at >http://www.evertype.com/standards/iso10646/pdf/vedic/Vedic_accents_doc.pdf >which shows the examples I wrote about. Got it. Thanks =F0=9F=91=8D =E0=A4=97=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=B0=E0=A5=81, 5 =E0=A4=AE=E0=A4=88 2022, 10:26 pm = =E0=A4=95=E0=A5=8B Madhu =E0=A4=A8=E0=A5=87 =E0=A4=B2=E0= =A4=BF=E0=A4=96=E0=A4=BE: > * Sameer Singh mail.gmail.com> : > Wrote on Thu, 5 May 2022 21:39:29 +0530: > >> I believe there is a similar problen with composition of devanagari > >> stress accents with devanagari numerals > > > > Does it even make sense for the stress accents to appear with the > numerals? > > Shouldn't they only appear with the consonants and vowels? > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > Can't speak for the unicode consortium, but I believe it is the practice > in marking certain specific accents in rig veda and atharva veda (which > I enumerated). check the table on the last page of Wikner's document at > http://www.evertype.com/standards/iso10646/pdf/vedic/Vedic_accents_doc.pd= f > which shows the examples I wrote about. > > (I think I've come across unicode text in the wild which used these, and > so assumed these are rendered "visually correctly" by other software) > > > --000000000000625c9205de46c292 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>check the table on the last page of Wikner's >= document at
>http://www.evertype.co= m/standards/iso10646/pdf/vedic/Vedic_accents_doc.pdf
>= which shows the examples I wrote about.

Got it. Thanks =F0=9F=91=8D

=E0=A4=97=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=B0=E0= =A5=81, 5 =E0=A4=AE=E0=A4=88 2022, 10:26 pm =E0=A4=95=E0=A5=8B Madhu <enometh@meer.net> =E0=A4=A8=E0=A5= =87 =E0=A4=B2=E0=A4=BF=E0=A4=96=E0=A4=BE:
*=C2=A0 Sameer Singh <CAOR1sLw5J_vrJHo9H8N=3DSS=3DtSidAvNytfUoXYT= 6B8HG1HpEHFg @mail.gmail.com> :
Wrote on Thu, 5 May 2022 21:39:29 +0530:
>> I believe there is a similar problen with composition of devanagar= i
>> stress accents with devanagari numerals
>
> Does it even make sense for the stress accents to appear with the nume= rals?
> Shouldn't they only appear with the consonants and vowels?
> Please correct me if I am wrong.

Can't speak for the unicode consortium, but I believe it is the practic= e
in marking certain specific accents in rig veda and atharva veda (which
I enumerated). check the table on the last page of Wikner's document at=
http://www.ever= type.com/standards/iso10646/pdf/vedic/Vedic_accents_doc.pdf
which shows the examples I wrote about.

(I think I've come across unicode text in the wild which used these, an= d
so assumed these are rendered "visually correctly" by other softw= are)


--000000000000625c9205de46c292--