Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious

[Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <paaguti@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1087 bytes --]

Lars> I am aware of this :-)
:-)) The teacher in me speaking ;-)

How reliable is network-lookup-address-info in a partability scenario?
(Just curious...)

/PA

On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 09:29, Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> wrote:

> >>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:26:50 +0200, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <
> paaguti@gmail.com> said:
>
>     Robert> but ":1" is not a valid IPv4 nor IPv6 address.
>     Pedro> However "::1" is valid, as would be "FC01::33", The :: stands
> for all
>     Pedro> zeros.
>     Pedro> This for IPv6 _addresses_.
>
> I am aware of this :-)
>
>     Pedro> IPv6 _prefixes_ conform to ([0-9-a-fA-F]{1,4}:)+:/[0-9]+
>
> And this. Lars is checking for IP addresses here, not prefixes, hence
> my suggestion to use `network-lookup-address-info' (which is a thin
> veneer over getaddrinfo(3)).
>
> Robert
> --
>


-- 
Fragen sind nicht da um beantwortet zu werden,
Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
Georg Kreisler

Headaches with a Juju log:
unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run
a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1818 bytes --]