Answers inline,

Best, /PA

On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 at 10:00, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> From: Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <paaguti@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 08:32:14 +0200
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> Is there any conceptual difference between providing flyspell/ispell-mode and providing
> auto-complete suggestions in text mode?

Yes, there is: auto-complete suggestions happen _before_ you type,
whereas Flyspell happens _after_ you type.
But is that enough to make the activation/deactivation process so different?
I mean. currently, if you want flyspell-mode for a specific mode, you 
add 
```
(flyspell-mode 1)
```
to the hook function with the rest of the customisations for that mode.
Now, for auto-complete it goes the other way round... you need to add code
to disable it and that is confusing (al4m).
> I personally don't think so and would like a more
> thorough discussion on this. That we want Emacs to have as many features as modern text processors
> provide is something that I strongly support. That we want all these features to be activated by default in
> text mode merits much more debate. And that we want some and some not is confusing...

We already discussed that before installing the feature, but feel free
to start another discussion.
 
I missed it... (bad memories from the time when it took place) but yes, I'd like to be convinced why this feature
needs to be activated by default.

Thx, /PA
--
Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden,
Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
Georg Kreisler

Headaches with a Juju log:
unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet