From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: chad Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master c622627: * Clean-up temporary eln test-suite directory when exiting (bug#48060) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:47:18 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20210427213426.6174.29110@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210427213427.8318C20D0F@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87pmyebq8y.fsf@gmx.de> <834kfqhakv.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2d2dxel.fsf@gnu.org> <83v985ekfl.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jpe94q.fsf@gnu.org> <831ratdt2i.fsf@gnu.org> <877dklyuv4.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000098167a05c1229a30" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25321"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Andrea Corallo , EMACS development team To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 29 22:48:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lcDaT-0006TD-E1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 22:48:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39574 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcDaS-00014q-HV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:48:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcDZX-0000ec-Sa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:47:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]:37779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcDZP-0003gz-5M; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:47:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id 2so14153456lft.4; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:47:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Of3PQEwEoUf1wBJpCp7Od42BnAG4CW/sODsrOh+/xZw=; b=dWe+JTQgydNc+TUd6vp9ejM+vT0urT4Abqjg1qjGPSYCSMVeRdn/gU+cO8rLhXZgEU ieB1qD75eafKnczkH0A3VPrwcKw+P/FwIovJmY4E2iDAVOd2ZZA62iThb2/Xkn3eplC5 Q3ismVXvjaBKY1iXI1PfvzvudpJxhG+KpZ/S7SBqGl/HTP08I9U5+et1eHsqsHsnIGJP zezFOfFe90t/jPsKMCDFq/0Q4v/kB/oXWSFwWWrePaFcQwiR0vzluOmJNyTKqt9yFqKs GP3bUyl7zfBYZgTVUWbLErjdH2bo10R6Px0b2ykQ2JhCYReVRJVY+ICIlFF66lZfTuwt YFsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Of3PQEwEoUf1wBJpCp7Od42BnAG4CW/sODsrOh+/xZw=; b=uMyr3z0NzRZG8L8MZc0NH+RANV4se9QvZSiEg5HbVZHiPImSmWnDURgM+4BI5omrlp gOEVmiCmqp3+dM7MpaQH+xh2VNwrAL+vVStk6hyNAL1s3JRdLapgIN1OaMjxs42xZGHY 1W1CblWXnkf/KNMEmqtBSFS9y8z3B1APOI1mw+b93mMCSvffF+bJhEgsjMJJ0V37H1i9 0v2uvaNoe4siqX1t21GxhTq2RePU5Y/Eh7IV4ZGshZWh7k29NQCh/q+Ry2fljKWbBe1t G/zwfp9/f252MlcqpyFkXXse0kAFR1MdIi4nRXMlRA55nJWVQEBA9XptVRM5SBYN3f85 XmYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533yKS5W0lSWjbsGkpJbvLOcHQqtMnHREcWgoTqUIg089y4nxZkq g+HoCEh60IUEP9uKcn9mpSG4Zf+MzC6ZzYVXT5g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkKIuLX8PDoqUfUn4i8Oi9vBAdYdS6OwiILhXE2+pn472iHANJBZXg1HustgbUbiu/TehkH4qmrF4XM0VyKV8= X-Received: by 2002:a19:f504:: with SMTP id j4mr955196lfb.307.1619729250259; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:47:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877dklyuv4.fsf@gmx.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::12e; envelope-from=yandros@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x12e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268639 Archived-At: --00000000000098167a05c1229a30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 8:28 AM Michael Albinus wrote: > Something like this. But instead of using --eval, we could honor an > environment variable $EMACSELNLOADPATH, like we do already with > $EMACSLOADPATH? Or we could add an invocation option --elndirectory=dir, > like we do already with --directory=dir? > At the risk of opening a can of worms... Would it make sense to have emacs look for an eln directory underneath dirs given to $EMACSLOADPATH/--directory? Put another way, would it make sense to have the eln load path conceptually tied to the non-eln load path? From my naive vantage, I would usually want that, and I have a hard time thinking of non-convoluted situations where I would want them to be separate, EXCEPT for the platform-(in)dependent file system issue, which doesn't seem like a concern for the test suite. Apologies if this re-covers past ground; I've tried to keep up, but have probably missed/forgotten some details. ~Chad --00000000000098167a05c1229a30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 8:28 AM Micha= el Albinus <michael.albinus@gm= x.de> wrote:
Something like this. But instead of using --eval, we could honor an
environment variable $EMACSELNLOADPATH, like we do already with
$EMACSLOADPATH? Or we could add an invocation option --elndirectory=3Ddir,<= br> like we do already with --directory=3Ddir?

<= div>At the risk of opening a can of worms... Would it make sense to have em= acs look for an=C2=A0 eln directory=C2=A0underneath dirs given to $EMACSLOA= DPATH/--directory?

Put another way, would it make = sense to have the eln load path conceptually tied to the non-eln load path?= From my naive vantage, I would usually want that, and I have a hard time t= hinking of non-convoluted situations where I would want them to be separate= , EXCEPT for the platform-(in)dependent file system issue, which doesn'= t seem like a concern for the test suite.

Apologie= s if this re-covers past ground; I've tried to keep up, but have probab= ly missed/forgotten some details.

~Chad
--00000000000098167a05c1229a30--