From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:52:24 -0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384908804 18566 80.91.229.3 (20 Nov 2013 00:53:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Brian Jenkins , Bozhidar Batsov , emacs-devel To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 20 01:53:29 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Viw2q-0000Pw-D8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 01:53:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52293 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Viw2q-0001En-3g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 19:53:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37011) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Viw2R-0000mQ-EC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 19:53:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Viw2L-0002NR-Oy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 19:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:42191) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Viw2L-0002N4-Jt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 19:52:57 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id y10so8298268wgg.2 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:52:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=htwCHveGLaCxLQ+YiDf2Gl6gRTgS4bTQOr1FlNupSeY=; b=iz1s/lFsDpjCUcdEPa2zf4R8DF1HU1uMoir7OwHwE18Ly6u+/YTb54+OaHdau3EIVT PnaTdjAxBNXtZ0nR+LqgRHZ8W3XrCdBO8Cj/ls6BD3+Km2m8CpzZ42kX8qaVXOyDFYts 50oyZFDk+1c7H8nCfEuTt1BW1da1ltSofUcA9wh2jjui/grrJTJvKnrTGqtXfweljD8V UP0cOKKolvvas0xWrXOIJzQe6P7DNFbuFAvAxc3rN2WB4eeJX3dZy2bqjsgGB2dEKceB JN44/61JO8xg+unpj15B1fwyC8ASTTRdn6IZr2KHZpmVftMlquxdJkSKFLpF12fMjYZ1 LlXg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkssnGd+kQ9wDUggnDCiqHKzpA+9MKCEoKrJIg4Xu8Fa8jbh+jFMjsaSvDSMAF7nZBDqr2n X-Received: by 10.180.97.5 with SMTP id dw5mr22930176wib.42.1384908776184; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:52:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.194.24.7 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:52:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: IjAmHrpgbLHIzZj01K-SsIgjHDU X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 74.125.82.47 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165410 Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > That is, I expect that they won't be assigned by *polite* Lisp packages. > It would be rude to set these hooks in a package published for > widespread use. > > Then at least they should be documented so as to tell people > not to do this. These frame focus hooks are closely related to the select-window-hook that was proposed and ultimately rejected a few years back[0]. Would such a hook be accepted now if its documentation were to contain a similar warning? [0] http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7381#59 Josh