From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 14:49:34 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4F2EAF8E.3010106@alice.it> <83d39tcjdx.fsf@gnu.org> <87haz4zksa.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87fweozgbu.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87d39szb88.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87aa4wz9of.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328536224 25288 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2012 13:50:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 13:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Richard M. Stallman" , Angelo Graziosi To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 14:50:22 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RuOxa-0005G6-9q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:50:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41370 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuOxZ-0007Mm-Gj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:50:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39749) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuOxS-0007Mf-IE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:50:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuOxO-0002ie-6O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:49123) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuOxA-0002bm-0Z; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:49:56 -0500 Original-Received: by lamf4 with SMTP id f4so3666641lam.0 for ; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:49:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g21+fSQTPbGJnxZ3qY4xcXNGB21B4wCiCazPQxxo2/c=; b=RjAGRr3aVQpClC17e2iorGKeckiN8cddxMWXHMA6w6vAaHM98S/WPg0Gx4UqFpW3XH gSWzOLxohizgoJJi7M+jKV2BsbY2AqX9BN8a8u4gR8Q/tUBSW2bthjYpXw2Yu1YOPBxt ZKWYn1EDKq5DoCRnpXI0yKZSysTMkNIZW1dqc= Original-Received: by 10.152.147.1 with SMTP id tg1mr9654056lab.22.1328536194098; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:49:54 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.12.6 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 05:49:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87aa4wz9of.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.215.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148256 Archived-At: On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 08:46, Stephen J. Turnbull wrot= e: > Stephen J. Turnbull writes: > > =C2=A0> =C2=A0> And when it comes to making the code easily accessible wo= uld not > =C2=A0> =C2=A0> something like DOI be useful? (http://www.doi.org/) > > =C2=A0> Sure, you *could* use DOI to point to that, but if you fail to up= date > =C2=A0> the DOI pointer when you upgrade the binary, you're in violation = of > =C2=A0> the GPL. > > Let me clarify that as Paul and others point out, you are in violation > of the letter of the GPL, which requires actual source, not a pointer, > but that's not what I meant. I do not understand what that would mean. Is not all you can give just a pointer? (Whether it is in the form of a http URL or a DOI URI does not really matter, or?)