> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:55:28 +0200
> From: Sebastian Wiesner <lunaryorn@gmail.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> 2013/6/24 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
> >> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:33:41 +0200
> >> From: Sebastian Wiesner <lunaryorn@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >>
> >> > IMO, unless we require every new feature to come with a test and a
> >> > report that no regressions were found by running the existing tests,
> >> > we will never get any better testability than what we have now.
> >>
> >> Then this is probably a good policy, isn't it?
> >
> > Which policy?
>
> Well, requiring tests for new features or fixed bugs, and confirmation
> that there are no regressions from the existing tests.
I believe it's good, obviously. The problem is with introducing it
without losing too many contributors.