From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87wrbs5vsx.fsf@gnu.org> <8139egbc9l.fsf@gmail.com> <8162jc7xy2.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319631656 22863 80.91.229.12 (26 Oct 2011 12:20:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:20:56 +0000 (UTC) To: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 26 14:20:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ2TT-0004Mc-JT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43133 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ2TT-000651-1W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:20:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ2TO-00064p-2C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:20:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ2TI-0006Yf-IF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:20:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:52655) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ2TD-0006VS-7H; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:20:35 -0400 Original-Received: by faat2 with SMTP id t2so1932708faa.0 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:20:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=klXYOrqb7zsllKaDNr7LsrsdKFzGC3V5coEu3VfMivk=; b=SIUZbQ6mLB/ArDQZ05Cl5JSI4/4sziV2ei2kC/u+VYBXgo58KaGO+KthfRoQv0PwY7 ISz6vtCBTSM58rY5C+PqdVoj7iWVZ9NCu8hZDbwulzLC/wJT8kSsTmQJ4PkQqR6oguUn MayEvq258J42D7qGCmt+TmjgK5r+9AiDkAxuY= Original-Received: by 10.223.39.20 with SMTP id d20mr56252253fae.37.1319631633227; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.152.42.202 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:20:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8162jc7xy2.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.161.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145567 Archived-At: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 14:13, Jambunathan K wrote= : > Jambunathan K writes: > >>> Martin recently introduced the command names >>> >>> =C2=A0 split-window-above-each-other -> C-x 2 >>> =C2=A0 split-window-side-by-side =C2=A0 =C2=A0 -> C-x 3 >>> >>> for which split-window-{vertically|horizontally} are now aliases. >> >> How about: >> >> split-window-and-stack-horizontally >> split-window-and-stack-vertically >> >> or >> >> split-window-and-arrange-horizontally >> split-window-and-arrange-vertically > > I like Tim's suggestion. > > Another variation of my earlier suggestion would be > > split-window-and-tile-horizontally > split-window-and-tile-vertically > > Since windows are always tiled but never stacked or arranged, so to > speak. Why do we need new names? Are not those introduced by Martin very clear and good?