From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: HTML-Info design Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 22:52:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87h9wqd3i5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87h9wqimf0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87y4q1fekv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fvc858c6.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87ioh4nf8k.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <83y4pzptpx.fsf@gnu.org> <871tnr1gqo.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <83bnmvowdb.fsf@gnu.org> <5499A3E2.2010601@yandex.ru> <87y4pyxiul.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <5499DC8D.5090009@yandex.ru> <87mw6exba0.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <87h9wlxosf.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <86d2767joy.fsf@dod.no> <86vbky5iby.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba97a86387a62050b25899f X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1419630749 9547 80.91.229.3 (26 Dec 2014 21:52:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 21:52:29 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-Devel devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 26 22:52:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4co3-00021p-QV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 22:52:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54468 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4co3-00010y-1A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:52:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4cnp-00010g-Kc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:52:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4cno-0002kz-Gh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]:43205) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4cno-0002ku-8s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:52:08 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id em10so17729537wid.5 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 13:52:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=36fB1x19kzFxlliJM6G0skpnRwtcBK6tPKNLwCSJ8QU=; b=fuD2ZJLwA29aS3ZQvIpJ0PQMexvV1PODwdrqd3rF6mdpS0InM0FTGG7B5Vl8YI60gU 7FSO/fqvb2iXBlDKkQJwaWdKlQDyW8WQNSbNHcCqShIcB5y63ej/qy/Chb8fF+U7tTq6 8o49ZJ90uk6poDQg5GLQo0w7eYWBVwddHlNHgga0anUZJc4yyE7iOL/tWFblbBhBiYb1 oJat5EsUPcV9zCYU4T1DW5JjEJyq71vvwVkO4fCbaK+Xj7q73fjQ2D1Hla57cIiKsegD 9BQLKOB79E2qB+uZBTeepsRQQQz1UcUJ76abNIybXT+JIfD7jOJ7BqxSXDU2jCXxPvOh MiPQ== X-Received: by 10.194.63.169 with SMTP id h9mr62494107wjs.23.1419630727426; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 13:52:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.194.93.228 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 13:52:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.194.93.228 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 13:52:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86vbky5iby.fsf@dod.no> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:180698 Archived-At: --047d7ba97a86387a62050b25899f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Dec 26, 2014 8:19 PM, "Steinar Bang" wrote: > > >>>>> Lennart Borgman : > > > Sure it can, but it looks to me like microdata (rather similar to > > RDFa) is preferred by the search engines now. > > Do you mean "microformat"? It is called microdata, see http://schema.org > I would be very surprised if google et. al > didn't look for both. So would I be, but at the moment microdata seems to come first. > > But that's beside the point. What I meant that RDFa is a good way to > add semantic information to the page, in a form that can be used by an > emacs HTML-info browser: you can define your own property types in an > RDFa compliant manner. Yes. And you can do the same with microdata I think. --047d7ba97a86387a62050b25899f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Dec 26, 2014 8:19 PM, "Steinar Bang" <sb@dod.no> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>:
>
> > Sure it can, but it looks to me like microdata (rather similar to=
> > RDFa) is preferred by the search engines now.
>
> Do you mean "microformat"?

It is called microdata, see ht= tp://schema.org

>=C2=A0 I would be very surprised if google et. al
> didn't look for both.=C2=A0

So would I be, but at the moment microdata seems to come fir= st.

>
> But that's beside the point.=C2=A0 What I meant that RDFa is a goo= d way to
> add semantic information to the page, in a form that can be used by an=
> emacs HTML-info browser: you can define your own property types in an<= br> > RDFa compliant manner.

Yes. And you can do the same with microdata I think.

--047d7ba97a86387a62050b25899f--