From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Errors in interactive commands Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 21:36:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87livbbta9.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312313847 22509 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2011 19:37:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 02 21:37:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QoKmH-0004f6-D0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 21:37:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56193 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QoKmG-0001Yp-V6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:37:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QoKmE-0001Yh-8m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:37:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QoKmD-0005du-25 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:37:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:37135) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QoKmC-0005dp-KF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:37:16 -0400 Original-Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so83648ewy.0 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:37:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=VdZFiwG5YB1lS4aaT40v/VSHSBR0OW7iE6M20cAYW1g=; b=Z55bSaPDWTnypQ0UaCKIRmjdsFbhJupx1KLSlxNlibzdWUuaSFiz5m8mcHJBD9bLQi MszUF7SFxrevjbo+3NlMXBOEGsnzk1MvNVxHvJmfhUmYvU+O/mNDF+k2mWTaQXcaNS6z khK/juyisWnaCa7bKs7ucrhaCwqXyUwwrj3m4= Original-Received: by 10.213.6.196 with SMTP id a4mr1422888eba.11.1312313835179; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.213.12.205 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 12:36:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.215.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142746 Archived-At: On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 21:25, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> I'm personally in favour of displaying a message, because it makes >> editing with toggle-debug-on-error less painful. What do others think? > > debug-ignored-errors should make this concern irrelevant for the > decision of which behavior to choose. The reason some commands raises an error is that they want to give control back to the command loop. debug-ignore-errors can't fix that, or?