From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: clang vs free software Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:15:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87fvqtg02v.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <52D81960.2080408@yandex.ru> <52DA8C17.4080707@yandex.ru> <52DC00E5.3020803@yandex.ru> <52DC6A26.3020003@yandex.ru> <87k3dv9z85.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87eh439w1n.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87ha8yqvup.fsf@engster.org> <87r47zezcc.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04389259c265ff04f0e11159 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390749364 9860 80.91.229.3 (26 Jan 2014 15:16:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Helmut Eller , Richard Stallman , Emacs-Devel devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 26 16:16:12 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W7RRS-0002cI-TX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:16:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54999 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7RRS-0002Xm-9j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:16:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7RRO-0002XW-61 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:16:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7RRN-0004Wb-ED for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:16:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]:56807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7RRM-0004WH-1y; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:16:04 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id l18so4675152wgh.35 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 07:16:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=OKSQ9hdUtA1whHDJWtUGVp68feNAnZQ9rr6m/XPdsLQ=; b=soy8j/Dqo47OUFzWM8DOK0wD/3SGTH6Y9rPUi6u9DflqQy2HlXt3tgEirCCZfoIodV iBDMHzTvFuTrc3+6C1BNrwr6+f66BSRzIIIs8S6dzl50BAyIqs255mO1ykDWA6xMtqGS LY+xVdw6EMj5C1aM+VLR4ey7O0Z/nm4PtvhNo+ZgL9xvJDOv9ryXXTIDov7RehPogaUk JkOgXAS8+E6rR9WJ2Alt+X31IQ3C0WHIDBSny5g0P/tE3zJbHSLJhs1h2/AXhiv81TRc ow/Wk5rFiTSV0Gr4HWfgZOJO/klSyNtgeneKSHaZWvNYjDS1b62DJ35Dm5hHd/FP8yp2 L7Og== X-Received: by 10.181.13.40 with SMTP id ev8mr9278934wid.16.1390749363101; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 07:16:03 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.194.216.227 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 07:15:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169124 Archived-At: --f46d04389259c265ff04f0e11159 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > We don't want to make a program's entire AST available for parsing > > because that would make it easy to extend GCC with proprietary > > programs. > > Let me just say that even tho I understand and agree with the goal, > I disagree. > > > Stefan > > +1 --f46d04389259c265ff04f0e11159 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= un, Jan 26, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:=
> We don't want to = make a program's entire AST available for parsing
> because that would make it easy to extend GCC with proprietary
> programs.

Let me just say that even tho I understand and agree with the goal, I disagree.


=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Stefan

+1
--f46d04389259c265ff04f0e11159--