From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ben Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp's future Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 22:00:53 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87wq97i78i.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <86k2dk77w6.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <642fd4b4-8b1c-a537-5a5f-6940691ec4b9@gmail.com> <48fddde1-7dd9-f640-0171-ea3cecc09670@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c03cd628f5f20053e5af4b7 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475935275 4420 195.159.176.226 (8 Oct 2016 14:01:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 14:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Brinkhoff , Philippe Vaucher , Emacs developers To: Nikolay Kudryavtsev Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 08 16:01:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bssBY-0000Cd-PP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 16:01:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41271 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bssBX-0007eX-Ev for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 10:01:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43306) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bssBN-0007eI-B3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 10:00:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bssBL-00017e-Fo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 10:00:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22d]:32940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bssBL-00016v-Bi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 10:00:55 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id k64so6659650itb.0 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 07:00:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zlxvgvpWfrKqtWKLdzjmNciZ6et2fQGLNe+Vv98zzpQ=; b=MRR2hKBLqsIkl5EyyfpuU9L0MZBf4Zos8V1thjvMGvZ4GZFG4oraCfXiYdAlKzS0oq 1TvNF+bkHJYVMOe6DuNZ7rhJ09qE7c3+QyRWLSUzGoiQ67taITq50V4Z0pLL+cDqzSwH mZnmaTzpS1j67BEwAFwiO1UINjKqwq20EkCpu6VAWtZeKsKJk+qzF+mHop++R6YiumFr qOa39iPOZFivGmkeeVJ315hhPHOEa7vkAN94Brl5WDoN0jCHR9e0qA59CD5bAbaLIjx1 yAbplqnO1/t/X9JjNRy0hcLlyPXGe1wn21L+hITzMQn6WyUzLsXYpd6FPnKcBPRvtNRv FlEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zlxvgvpWfrKqtWKLdzjmNciZ6et2fQGLNe+Vv98zzpQ=; b=Mk6LFV0wIcf2eGk8fWBAe3W6/6VHPnRRJZcoFVN0gG3O0cdw3qLCxCe4ZQdQKfa4+C nGdzABWCyf2rJIzYPXyF1/uj1qBwdnXsrmr0a9REnrLO9POd/QX1mJqkbecriSuZ3v9C oShQ5n9HZgFG3XqUfYN5wA3BPLTRKvxeDJCS7Ylr8MA7HkxdkQB48mDqdB6cm/pL6Js5 00X3Gnv3q6yNsjN0ZGNYbqJ87qa7f/FE8iatJhcSjqb2Df2eb8Xktf+jC6fjNRo6VNBG K8DXuAvU4qSGVYgV65yEA9FxF0ixeJvDxJJ+ll5CctOLkDGHJOkLLRN0baB3gJ2ujEJY gRaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkcXeXMR4TJj4LpJ9FkSLZZO2XEf96N/YKGkBuxn32TAsZZBPxGON75IS0ZALoj64q9Ah1u+MJPCwG7bQ== X-Received: by 10.36.163.197 with SMTP id p188mr3205230ite.107.1475935254555; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 07:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.107.136.211 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Oct 2016 07:00:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48fddde1-7dd9-f640-0171-ea3cecc09670@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208094 Archived-At: --94eb2c03cd628f5f20053e5af4b7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Why is it that nobody mentions Racket when talking about lisp or scheme? IMHO it's quite an practical and elegant dialect of lisp/scheme. On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Nikolay Kudryavtsev < nikolay.kudryavtsev@gmail.com> wrote: > And that project already exists as Guile Emacs. But here we jump into a > different territory - the current runtime is relatively well tested, > polished and stable among all platforms. While Guile is not and I'm not > sure if there is a free software lisp runtime that is. So, apart from being > a lot of work just to migrate, for which there is no manpower, we would > also introduce a whole slew of new bugs. > > > -- > Best Regards, > Nikolay Kudryavtsev > > > --94eb2c03cd628f5f20053e5af4b7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Why is it that nobody mentions Racket when talking about l= isp or scheme?=C2=A0 IMHO it's quite an practical and elegant dialect o= f lisp/scheme.

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Nikolay Kudryavtsev &l= t;nikola= y.kudryavtsev@gmail.com> wrote:
And that project already exists as Guile Emacs. But here we jump into = a different territory - the current runtime is relatively well tested, poli= shed and stable among all platforms. While Guile is not and I'm not sur= e if there is a free software lisp runtime that is. So, apart from being a = lot of work just to migrate, for which there is no manpower,=C2=A0 we would= also introduce a whole slew of new bugs.


--
Best Regards,
Nikolay Kudryavtsev



--94eb2c03cd628f5f20053e5af4b7--