From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yuan MEI Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay issue Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 00:09:04 -0800 Message-ID: References: <83fuzqr1iz.fsf@gnu.org> <8337vqqwz7.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4dhonng.fsf@gnu.org> <83two4olqj.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9k3mphx.fsf@gnu.org> <834mg2kvj7.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1upj6ml.fsf@gnu.org> <83si3kht2b.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449130162 24398 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2015 08:09:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 08:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 03 09:09:17 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a4Ox2-0002Ee-Rf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 09:09:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33933 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4Owx-0006NZ-DY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 03:09:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48713) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4Owt-0006La-Mg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 03:09:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4Ows-0005Ac-UA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 03:09:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ig0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229]:36944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4Owr-0005AJ-8t; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 03:09:05 -0500 Original-Received: by igcto18 with SMTP id to18so6607873igc.0; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 00:09:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=B5hDuGs3psiW6wha+DPsQBP/SrHd5gqyeD6hwBDTGgA=; b=tE8JuiV5czyLLsjenBLBY+b1/lbVZuQw/cbVpZU89KnLrECrAzETWYOFIiZwbXaTwN KuCZWErs8LI1SP3XN4FaVfuNz5G0NJHAu3/9dFgRSFy8GP7uMyvPgPIVkdnfz5OdGWV9 Qswgi7Q0aRr7XmFpCgUEks7kcDQvBRS7TKTfBraYlKfeZVUrSpRRmvLYS+lluJfONiic 7jV6Huj7QNYfRZw/jQ+gwBkjXlMlYy8Hpodm+aiH3LPUX8AQZrxSCsnANiYjJ16LBfiy RTGh4jmwErg7V/e5oMT9qlRfMvST7U8XBL3/W3RBkVQLR6EzQNPnBl3YApV4ZXfSOnf9 ImaA== X-Received: by 10.50.3.71 with SMTP id a7mr7510348iga.80.1449130144569; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 00:09:04 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.107.14.143 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 00:09:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83si3kht2b.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195800 Archived-At: > Everything is different with Cairo, including the fonts: the Cairo > build has its own font back-end (see ftcrfont.c). > > How large is the difference? Do you see changes in frame/window > dimensions that correlate to those differences in height? Emacs.Geometry: 100x59+2+2 Without Cairo: Width: 818 Height: 1022 With Cairo: Width: 818 Height: 962 So for the same screen height, I gain 4 lines of text when using Cairo.