> From: Rocky Bernstein <rocky@gnu.org>
> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:55:06 -0500
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> That there is also a SHA of the text. If the text in any of those 60 files is identical it doesn't matter for purposes
> of debugging and error location determination which one
> in the set you decide to call the source.
If there's a SHA, why do we also need a file name?
> I'm saying that the minuscule amount of times it will work will drown
> in the sea of times it won't. Worse, when it "doesn't work", it will
> many times produce a false alarm: the file name is different, but the
> contents was identical.
>
> If that's the case, then how is this different than what we have now?
If it isn't different, why add the recording of file names? It does
nothing to improve the situation.