From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tadeus Prastowo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:14:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1552789070.5272.1@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="21632"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel , Konstantin Kharlamov To: Philippe Vaucher Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 17 14:19:54 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h5Vhh-0005XY-0y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:19:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55645 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5Vhf-0007Au-U1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:19:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53547) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5VhS-00079f-Tu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:19:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5VcG-0007si-TP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:14:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]:36394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5VcG-0007sA-9G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:14:16 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id f6so12052459iop.3 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 06:14:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=unitn.it; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q4cZNnEfoRF+xqOlDfPjmG36RqB8E+88k3P+HhBK+p4=; b=Y/J1x2MfRhZzCjZKGKfM8g320+mrZ2LWpDYWsluJWL35t8ibUPndGJSAiKInDfKKE9 6EpGS+7ONTLzE4zaSO5/7NibXQdE8MoDI9pq+/lgo7XZmZDI0RvyHWBmHdHX7UlAFa4T S6k+YTFZkGRgBNnu6f+OweSUAPn01uRVxlX48= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q4cZNnEfoRF+xqOlDfPjmG36RqB8E+88k3P+HhBK+p4=; b=XD5iySspFA/ypYOie+bbf9174r6H0c7KBALfayVLVosISdH6bk6hTTK+qViATaDPHw eR5LKnYp17sUVksFBwvYeBrtbIS9g7nK2LFUXL2KjUTkkPuWD9gEFl3Rr+loHqijystY Wlb/e5oEZTQzkf6J2fuCbNK7ZSLyUZKplbjMxudk1IOgYA0Tu1KiyI4DNiCHS0Siw+Ee mQ+ZRaLvG1Hs4t/oy4DSj+xxBAcID2i4WJiEH7tQztWZ+NvSNs4JCTIwBeZfua+N/IKe I9s09d0B6QFt1vUceEVpycLD063u7g+ZH2vSwYVeuxxvFKlMhZvvNID8dBW7CSRhoIkE IQCg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWftfRDkO3LZxQ8eAD71r8wT2ejzyWyMkVwaTsREldLTM+oYI62 TSx9h7NGRNd6XaNKLIY7pFwCdxS5ksoCRUfgaMfx X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz74tFQ3wjbnnP7dojVLZ7m5luYIYeANAK8wKCT8FUHU3AB2TTgINrd+/PrF/2/WEKXrnwKlYRHiUvGh5eXCAc= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:aa07:: with SMTP id s7mr7820875ioe.139.1552828454886; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 06:14:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234264 Archived-At: On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 1:54 PM Philippe Vaucher wrote: > Now, the Emacs model is similar to the linux kernel dev & the git dev wor= kflow, so obviously "it works fine" and has advantages too, but personally = I think those are outweighted by the the disadvantages (or rather than the = contribution experience is much nicer with gitlab). IMO, I feel more comfortable with the current Emacs model because I see less noise in the interface. Furthermore, the current model allows me to do my own way of automation against a stable simple interface (plain-text e-mails and textual command lines have been around for a long time). This may not be welcoming to newcomers, but I once was a newcomer in the Linux kernel dev but found nothing so difficult about it. > Kind regards, > Philippe -- Best regards, Tadeus