On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 1:44 AM Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
wrote:

> One more thing: indeed you don't need the (setq lexical-binding t), and
> furthermore it can be harmful (it can cause other (unrelated) code to be
>

Ah, excellent.  This was something I was curious about.  I had been using
that as a crutch during development and I wasn't entirely sure about it
outside of that context.

I've made changes as suggested, lightly tested and version bumped to 1.0.2

Thanks for the feedback!