From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Hackney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests and no external tar! Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:51:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y5cx0wh7.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365278673 30131 80.91.229.3 (6 Apr 2013 20:04:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 20:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , Emacs development discussions To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 06 22:04:32 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UOZJD-0001KY-GR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 22:01:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35744 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UODbh-0006s8-Vp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 16:51:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52896) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UODbb-0006ry-Ob for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 16:51:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UODbV-0004Rz-Ui for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 16:51:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]:44528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UODbV-0004Rn-M1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 16:51:21 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id c11so4860889ieb.1 for ; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 13:51:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=haxney.org; s=google; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=6kJ8HCap/io1E/N8SpWoSCcEDFJ5ttLBxeSmntFtL6M=; b=NjK2MuGdldkaaK2+NuMsw/EYfUCSgc0K7XSsDw5T03SvJnjaRm9fRR9YksWWhSmMNw wnOM8b6hFSgvydqbTIBnJBnzRk/zRc53euTQsl5aCUGgldcE3CdeNJhltUE63b9/uV9j /3vZC6GYiIMbQyqXrVxf2tzbkePTnyiuB7FMc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=6kJ8HCap/io1E/N8SpWoSCcEDFJ5ttLBxeSmntFtL6M=; b=RbfmMoCHol6mmUjKjBSag9FEMu3fw05VGCcOQTgc3HFnqh1f/2Uvp1wTfJvT8Suqsp x3yNN1c1EMAh2AS8NcLT8wMvLKi8FC5Hxr0C3a4SkChVudjOuS/AOXbcRtcPPlQ34RLh ZJvthEI3U3pFvAJyjEd0wgZzqgdJCt+FX6+2jV+I6H23AX5luuq6zjUtmjgZnqDZ6YZH hAyEoLQNHecVkl1fm0kg9wzwuG/A7cfkqo/UQsbWGA/lrIXKTbmwveT7w+BhTe2h9/01 49bTkmyzyzG28TmTnAGFCXKvOcykXuPj9l2Wwp6mIO8pby/QM3E6x+Xo7wSaK/FUPuEW rbUw== X-Received: by 10.50.13.100 with SMTP id g4mr501289igc.44.1365195080476; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 13:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.64.54.39 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 13:51:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y5cx0wh7.fsf@yandex.ru> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmhCQyE1PKun8V4dS5f8sdZHCO+g86nCh4kahTK3wnCCmSd/WAZNJ8uUq/iKbuizo730fWR X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158723 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov wrote: > It doesn't seem to apply cleanly to trunk, but here's the diff: > > https://github.com/haxney/emacs/compare/3a5be1e2bf8b8b096f7c656c99f644b7dd0c4bab...package-rewrite.diff > > It also has no ChangeLog entries (currently; the contents of the above > URL will update if/when Daniel adds them). I guess I'll have to rebase it off of trunk. Sorry about not giving a usable diff. I realized that I have a few things left to do for the patch: - Create ChangeLog entries - Update package-x.el. I haven't touched it and it is going to be horribly broken. A question: should I submit this as a single large patch or break it up? It doesn't make much sense to have it broken up, since it is really an all-or-nothing overhaul, but if people want it broken up, I can certainly do so. -- Daniel Hackney