I've just noticed that issue myself. Is there any progress on it?


On 7 November 2013 18:02, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:

> >>> Is it at all possible to change the grammar this way?
> >> You'd probably have to use a trick similar to the " @ " used on the
> >> space between the method name and the multiple-args.
> > Ah, okay. Sounds not very efficient, performance-wise.
>
> Could be.  Every trick we add to the tokenizer is a potential
> performance problem, indeed.  On the contrary, code in the
> rules-function is generally not performance sensitive.
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>