On 9 July 2013 03:40, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> wrote:

> On 08.07.2013 13:22, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
>> a. Ruby trunk has some objectionable code, which I believe we shouldn't
>>> merge, and noone seems to be interested in discussing or reverting it:
>>> http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/**issues/6854<http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6854>
>>>
>>
>> "deep-indent", huh?
>>
>
> Yep. Cryptic name and docstring, plus no comments in the code. All par for
> the course. :)
>
>
>  I don't give it a name in SMIE, but I use the
>> "hanging-p" name for the test to choose between doing it or not (which
>> seems to be pretty much the same test you use in the current
>> ruby-mode.el).
>>
>
> I'm not sure what piece of logic in ruby-mode you mean exactly, but if
> SMIE does indentation similar to e.g. js-mode (indentation inside parens
> depends on whether the opener is followed by a newline), then that's
> behavior I prefer and have in my config via defadvice. ruby-mode currently
> picks between "deep" and "not-so-deep" indent based on whether the current
> opener is in `ruby-deep-indent-paren'.
>
> In practice, with SMIE in ruby-mode enabled, I would expect
>
> foo(
>     1,
>     2,
>     3)
>
> to be indented as
>
> foo(
>   1,
>   2,
>   3)
>
> which doesn't happen.
>
>
>  b. They've had a bug about removing ruby-mode.el for months now:
>>> http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/**issues/6823<http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6823>Again, no movement there.
>>>
>>
>> Maybe making the trunk code work in 23.4 (for example) would help
>> convince people to drop it from ruby-lang.  I encourage people to post
>> a "vote to remove as well" to this bug-tracker.
>>
>
> Maybe it would. I posted a "me too" there.


Me too. Hopefully someone will have a look at the issue at some point.


>
>
>  c. No ELPA repositories are tracking Ruby trunk anymore.  We just have
>>> some older versions uploaded to Marmalade and Tromey's archive a while
>>> back.
>>>
>>
>> That's good.  So we should indeed upload a newer version (or better
>> yet, remove those out dated versions).
>>
>
> https://github.com/nicferrier/**marmalade/issues/55<https://github.com/nicferrier/marmalade/issues/55>
>
> I'm not sure if I should Cc Tom Tromey, after all, his repository is
> supposed to be completely out of use.
>