On 13 July 2013 22:10, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> wrote:

> On 13.07.2013 14:23, Bozhidar Batsov wrote:
>
>> Great! Btw, shouldn't we highlight the conversion methods from Kernel
>> (Float, Integer, etc) as built-ins?
>>
>
> Sure, it's now easier to do correctly. Done. :)


Thanks!


>
>
>      But there's really nothing that would distinguish a Math::E
>>     reference from Foo::C. Or from GC, IO, DL, IRB, URI, XML, HTML, etc.
>>
>>
>> Yep, I'm aware we can't distinguish all cases without the use of a
>> proper parser, but I guess we should handle accordingly at least the
>> scenarios which are deterministic.
>>
>
> But we have to highlight these abbreviation-named modules *somehow*. And
> we're bound to be wrong in 50% of these cases. That's why I don't think
> it's a good idea.
>
> That difference in highlighting wouldn't convey much information anyway:
> uppercase text with underscores is easy to notice as it is.
>

Fair enough :-)