From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: sendmail.el Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 11:48:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472917758 6277 195.159.176.226 (3 Sep 2016 15:49:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 15:49:18 +0000 (UTC) To: Noam Postavsky , rms@gnu.org, Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 03 17:49:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bgDBq-0000G3-Sa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 17:49:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46885 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgDBo-0004CB-Ma for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 11:49:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgDBi-00049g-7K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 11:48:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgDBg-0007Vx-9E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 11:48:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]:35152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgDBd-0007VU-Pi; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 11:48:53 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id p186so164220325oia.2; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 08:48:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=NaQmqR5yh8D8FPp+tKTfVMfe2qPSb65KT5ohmXHmKsY=; b=OacnmY00r3e5gC/We9rZyfbo6I8EE29KuwcFYGhpPTMFQfEzdhj/+XxxN6hqk6Fv2u Bj4KM3yXmb41DDJ0uZ5V8xJVi9ykIaQy6JVovwRFZ8DFAGqc0JgkAxY169yRgjcoatKb R5baVbClYJlKi88MEP74vRyKJKl/eujtgLgQXgWHfCwoanTW1zv90Vs+TM2DD8sS0WG0 pFxOhcDXVM3abTW5ky33h2+S7r8yG9CBwleEsaANJPzO0mk2kGOue+fIAyg+8QMqMQDz gh3clLcAhCjSTkKhkUJ7bzSVx3wdgLdTKUS/+5DpazG7CdMFX9/Ea3kK0rVXJF7irrCG kXrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NaQmqR5yh8D8FPp+tKTfVMfe2qPSb65KT5ohmXHmKsY=; b=ltrWqO/T5uVjK3zYcBCITmSecNV/8KaR7ge0ujfpHxdDGDo9cn8uYchrIMpQTWVzo2 o2hSEsQGiEZcHap64Gs19GJ6sz+qT+bhEgtmwxEvGfLHlHsK60s2ZdR6mmSiq2W0sWUi GGsmSU6CLBGVLYFfAo6U6r5OlMDP/iqCMtkWnO4L953abJMHpg8Wz3ZIXwsSB2gkE8mV XDwJFtw+umOObgqjMtO+SH9nPEY1rKb0ARMxqoEnfbSGofp7p7NEYhreh6lvHzY5AmvU 5HDTQJcTYrJLV1Tt5pC1G6XAH44JdrsRCDTgXRPuBIQ3mx7j8gjZdoCSEr2by12AlrbX wKuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOGyUZgH6bAZCmsUk5N46PLJ8AT3ChrU3UTyMUmaBzCreTi+h03I1Me96DY8Br/Xs9znG7446hmFSYMog== X-Received: by 10.157.36.118 with SMTP id p109mr26113576ota.124.1472917733217; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 08:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.7.195 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Sep 2016 08:48:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: ulMOAXbPDa-C4xN9DiPziU4S1CQ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207154 Archived-At: On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:01 PM, John Wiegley wrote: >>>>>> "NP" == Noam Postavsky writes: > > NP> The function `mail-combine-fields' hasn't changed since you introduced it > NP> in 79a16968 Wed Aug 12 11:25:26 2015 "Offer to combine multiple To or CC > NP> fields[...]". So the bug is present on both emacs-25 and master branches. > NP> But I guess it's too late to fix for 25.1 by now. > > Yes, it is too late, harmless thought it may be. Accepting it in 25.1 would > mean another release candidate, and another round of waiting, which I'd like > to avoid except for truly damaging bugs. > I've pushed to master as 5fbba6cc "Fix mail-combine-fields".