From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fix to handling of C++ digit separators, improvements in handling of single quotes. Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 11:47:25 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20170701161008.GB8743@acm> <20170702130543.GA2153@acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499010499 4770 195.159.176.226 (2 Jul 2017 15:48:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 15:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 02 17:48:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dRh6Z-0000ss-SQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 17:48:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58415 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRh6f-0004qO-AU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 11:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47470) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRh5r-0004pX-ES for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 11:47:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRh5q-00048A-II for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 11:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]:33670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRh5q-000481-DX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 11:47:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id p188so66891040oia.0 for ; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 08:47:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Euvbz4U84ZhtLw4F06Q2sdGRxD+Jq7vSUZ5QZ4DAqgA=; b=elMbvb7ColONhFP9l7cnu8ysAv1y7XOHdscILl74cdnvkabAnSsTOqIZgtmNRo6qH7 TbYYA2fNTgzYts5O6L6BC9CWyptG4x+xNqOx/RAQ5fgB4AGwocMWgaR6izRNvCZPaMeF jq+n663Rehz/dRSxuy0A7IqT6UbDIn7chQ5zjEXwb4f5rBUn5TgCJ3kO6L0dVe++6H1t a299QflwYLwVRZLyzP/o76Ti4/wNgzCFtrYsjVmD83wXSMSG8XoTMXxq0XNSmMQUkuOp Cjs9/+BFhc5a/oyRDY7G/ocAcofLg0Av0GOPa7uSVumUKnzzyl/TmEKD/aD9KKncdR/3 zJDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Euvbz4U84ZhtLw4F06Q2sdGRxD+Jq7vSUZ5QZ4DAqgA=; b=mdmLVdlNN4B/tqb7FCnWs6UFAp23OoEPneq/gVdpbMe0xzD4nJjaL7PgkMiaFy1Xf+ 79EV7PX0m7T5K/Q2UF6iXzV9wPjiBK9Don+Tr1xz+jOft40OkGbPLF8lXXxJcSR77FfL 42PKftnIlHLE92UpW8ewk+9LFXLai/6OnPZKxx6QUKh+E6+FKsMFMf69D1XFcTsI2Sz9 iNWWEU+fn1iOKdeWe0a5vfKcDWskvM4GEHaIobC5RgaBN305oXDFOub0XS/c3UWbx3SL G1puwSZPK4rI5ikTmwx36bbZu+inM2ySO0U6edGLag4uxaYiwcNdP2dMjTdz5s+qQ/qI tDPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOz/uoKSBJXYmnaSyaDutYVGEXHKfiZl/ewES1ksBked5HfsjlS9 B9msr6tUg0R1j/3g01cGMqN/HwfCaw== X-Received: by 10.202.98.134 with SMTP id w128mr15475355oib.37.1499010445726; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 08:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.74.113.91 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 08:47:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170702130543.GA2153@acm> X-Google-Sender-Auth: BOL0mN3BZgUChCTxtzKfFADS4kU X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216110 Archived-At: On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > This should be fixed, now. Thanks, it works. > Obviously, I should have run the test myself. I'll be doing this in the > future. We came ahead this time anyway, since you uncovered a little bug I had introduced in the test machinery :)