From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:03:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8760stvwzp.fsf@web.de> <834m8cvu9p.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9cbpw61.fsf@web.de> <83wpl7v1sg.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8i2dfe3.fsf@web.de> <83poqyvh58.fsf@gnu.org> <87shvu1ixp.fsf@web.de> <8360spvn6i.fsf@gnu.org> <8760sjn5me.fsf@web.de> <871t37n51y.fsf@web.de> <8337nmon4l.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvluomaz.fsf@web.de> <83mvlun6zc.fsf@gnu.org> <83bn25fst6.fsf@gnu.org> <83vb0de91c.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468170223 25868 80.91.229.3 (10 Jul 2016 17:03:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , Yasushi SHOJI , me@wilfred.me.uk, Emacs developers To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 10 19:03:42 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bMI8q-00032N-2C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:03:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55985 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMI8p-0006Q3-8Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:03:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMI8a-0006JE-2J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMI8Y-00019x-7x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:03:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]:36031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMI8U-00017Q-GG; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:03:18 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x236.google.com with SMTP id n8so17935311oif.3; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 10:03:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=WKfqA3bD0v6WwINYCtfhRDWRR6N3/sTLAgDcogb/YwM=; b=AaCua/aHagSXfnWAkfZ8IjZC7PJXVf1f/zUi1GPd4H8v2cbeV/1GK71NInm4QGiRSo uIqMQz9K1kQ/cEUYMI4BjNiAj37DC1OtSOL9qi8v8uIYJ6iwRUrXzk92IkjVheIL/45y eR1f8mxN+PtTdu5aQD7TsJ1JyxOp2e4UnZi9O6RIgrZY/yN+q/HGAToezZTvKHxQSN3Q FgW/RcFPrbRdHpgh1wpnvFMvmRtkoFkAcd+6DzDPWqOEpO6R/OCo3MhFMlG31qW7qPc7 2cAylfeAJHTE5GeAjo5ISyePVrz13cHZ6qrXqHVt9mky14uLTMZ5LL6e4M4DYElU1k58 ym3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WKfqA3bD0v6WwINYCtfhRDWRR6N3/sTLAgDcogb/YwM=; b=aRUyD8y9iHYVIyBhvPKuaoFz2QqL5OfSkE40N7DCQ8PelVlomYSm2rlbwPoc1HRLH4 wT7AlarC6AE0fk/IP9yOiyWZ9Ebu6qdm4ecHXdHGW4ReUMjNjQyyYMtKyKfsHVPxzUiq RzyiK2pKDZZIYx2AV0lGkvp6rRQ9zN7Q8HJFwah7sS9Y0W6mRGYXONcbw/OoeFW7ZFtz Mxqap/4xToNZF7tMoQke0QnFKuvDQmNRpsdwrzt2znyli+ki1zAoGB/ptIuIvdRpTSe6 w61EpcbsOBx9eZ34i3CaGmxZrJBOoMaSBjHgtXFjFDwlQ7LNy7C0VO1WSjL+cw/naqSX GaKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKAD7fw4K+N4CvYunpGxs5ZnHKydN3+b/qgZ14+PobvGKlH+ui0KNg95irYNBS27kX/VkOx+4Km5bLcMA== X-Received: by 10.202.92.194 with SMTP id q185mr7718592oib.88.1468170197923; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 10:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.4.197 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 10:03:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83vb0de91c.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: xXjnRzpgd2PYsrcc5tEf99LIZFs X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205512 Archived-At: On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I don't think Fzerop is especially relevant, AFAICT, the error just >> means Fzerop received an unitialized value as its first argument. > > Sorry, I;m not following: Fzerop is called from Ffuncall, i.e. from > Lisp, so how can the value of Fzerop's argument be uninitialized? > What am I missing? Possibly there is an error in the bytecode interpreter? Is there an easy way to trace pushes and pops to the stack?