From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master cd0a795: Output number of characters added to file (Bug#354) Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 08:06:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20170407022529.14820.30445@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170407022531.17D812084C@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87r3143ndq.fsf@holos> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1491566783 9502 195.159.176.226 (7 Apr 2017 12:06:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 12:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jeff Clough , Emacs developers To: Mark Oteiza Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 07 14:06:18 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cwSee-0001f0-5D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 14:06:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50606 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwSej-000495-Tb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:06:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwSed-00048y-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:06:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwSec-0001ga-Vm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:06:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]:35988) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwSec-0001fO-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:06:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id r203so83222182oib.3 for ; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 05:06:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9nVMiyzhZqtlH3RvQ52h9vFKEASwEF2O5f0Pn/aoteU=; b=NqvAKOdihViltVmq1ckb41PKkc8Lgb1WVN8Z6BamWWdjo8ziR5oiXRjsY2iwZhhyag 8EdGDxkLVN//gujCzquaD2tNjmfHgMektH1c5MAWD/nIx8xiVfTyetqN1hZ6hOvwQAC/ f/WR5TLSwdkKj3s41KkUYsLzu2HbF0cT85qJZQjkvCI2zF+BUIF4Yi7ZYCkmbXkEDCGg KYUxNyRuPr4FD+sc36VPbCRGsq6MjKzw8jZ9pGjKdIyW4spCuHECammGE8bK980rIOBR 1KfmCORCyWvH8lbIOJ/qDHCz7lSmb+EQ26+hz9mZUAShA+pU1hWJMNsW9LSV+Yh/8ZI2 qRJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9nVMiyzhZqtlH3RvQ52h9vFKEASwEF2O5f0Pn/aoteU=; b=N2w/fymEmNCxf0zBCMAr0/IGiV/VnbzohFinEihON8iBFeMoI9u8hlaB+DLSG8KBak L1kBQ7vQxT1204TB/uVbNWo3GmKkzglK0vJEpySVx1LcYXcPEIZrsx9y4P9YgiPhHPXK +xM0lbzQ0NT+Y8LuThsXgvHvVzJdozGztWWxGmsPEPxUOfNVBxhPetahLK+koi7M98v1 9PoxjSsvJ+UoUty4a1HHC6ogk/qWDV4qJNlEQE12ytCKbwWOozi9+bEy6efLgIqmpQDJ IooS2OT1Hn/RTMtJQOQ6O16KpnC3hm1tnfvBmsDzgMDa4o1IIpITn0MXC03KjHpjNqVv wwKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2o0THqu9GSUz0zYTGuHHAtCjdej3aITDjTbLGYGMaIjunziZNcoBl5k/q05S0lkptB19RXA/TyHlp4Zw== X-Received: by 10.157.38.42 with SMTP id a39mr22599399otb.267.1491566773967; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 05:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.80.133 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 05:06:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r3143ndq.fsf@holos> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213742 Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Mark Oteiza wrote: >> >> Output number of characters added to file (Bug#354) > > This behavior is unnecessarily verbose, at least when just interactively > saving buffers. Haven't tested this otherwise. If I cared about the > number of characters in the buffer I'd look in the mode line or just do > C-x =. Would it help if we rearranged the message so that the number of characters go at the end? Something like: Wrote /foo/bar/blah (1314 characters)