From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-26: `with-eval-after-load' docstring omission Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 20:00:40 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1520557168 5478 195.159.176.226 (9 Mar 2018 00:59:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 00:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 09 01:59:24 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eu6NV-0001IQ-Kd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 01:59:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42691 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eu6PW-0004cd-Dj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 20:01:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57293) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eu6Oq-0004c7-82 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 20:00:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eu6Op-000589-H4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 20:00:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ot0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::230]:40674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eu6Op-00057P-Bo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 20:00:43 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ot0-x230.google.com with SMTP id l12so7273746otj.7 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:00:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C/GMgFBLzoOXjy4VdwbfwwU8VhZuoa6if0RgfbBAFLc=; b=U/R4jOJ6RZPXhSLSP4DENCpMMps39U5sNUqBML122UDMUh6YHOUrWDr5daMuPRYRRC cOUWyI0BEx354j8tJo6kC3y9BiVRqyWYeZGJ4mClOn7vLP8VL7zTG+EWmfyd2lQHDPTJ 3d+yCaNtzetAEVw8AXJ8RZDL2q+pZ4rW26gcjwVXkKa8LWn9AwQawLyBY26TiQ6tuO78 Z2VD2CUIbg8E5e8S83kSdKJh41ANEL0MN3rkgW7iYzHOBuAqofgHXxn5heC/qV0dlbio Bvkl67AxD9G/2vhWoFoDHSZTuFC6oOkerHXJFxPGqh0bmW5w1q6b7CIwqnsakzTvT+R7 8Y3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C/GMgFBLzoOXjy4VdwbfwwU8VhZuoa6if0RgfbBAFLc=; b=eC2oaHGcJ1Jt+ZOPRYa4RYBx8yMg9u0b+r9WVQJZcAL6Omlp9qxrdL5YyHVI5bWDsm YMf8JCl1PiVx5sV+yLvdpBHMz5ob+zzm3CbWn4FbjW4sPxHn4vBVeEibirfZm9VBAThG CXtNwBPODx1UH2XDI+KIh2f/93MPfe5okvDVfqpQp2a1hfdTUV3T3sxr1WRqLd88gsra j/KyVnO/75tfYqymMUlJPTTrjl+BqvEn3i/J+HKuOmtMLSswDN8Qnc6xv+6s+auWkhW1 q3fejlaw0+oDJ1dqh1s0/25b1zQ1ixs/Mlga+NFqNmUvIGk0M8FR8ZCU7gWnzzfcolPr BrTg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCeliXn62LLLNPNu0oDQ75Kt+4zfhtfBoN3GIW0lwBAkh1qFiyL BTTgEwEDh7kB762xNLh8XY4ec8LyRX7XbhhAqOU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsYTbvxbbnePXE5cp0CWGlejhsogAonpWnTEFahmvBklQKTOh2uIH4zm+0sLS1JNTBPvVM18yii8MlnqCyVM8g= X-Received: by 10.157.31.122 with SMTP id x55mr19888097otx.248.1520557241276; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:00:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.74.59.65 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:00:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:223523 Archived-At: On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:39 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Still, an elaboration on the behavior of =E2=80=98with-eval-after-load= =E2=80=99 could >> be useful. Something like: "BODY will be called as a function with no >> arguments through =E2=80=98funcall=E2=80=99." > > That can't be the doc: going though funcall is an > implementation detail. The doc has to explain the behavior > independently from how it's implemented. Does it though (eval-after-load's docstring doesn't seem to)? Maybe we should just say Equivalent to (eval-after-load FILE (lambda () BODY)).