From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Segfault during fontification of rgrep buffers [HELP NEEDED] Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:08:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477609761 11991 195.159.176.226 (27 Oct 2016 23:09:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 23:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Herwig Hochleitner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 28 01:09:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bztn0-0007QF-H8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 01:08:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44997 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bztn3-0004Xz-0n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:08:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bztmu-0004Xi-7T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:08:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bztmt-0002Rd-5M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:08:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::244]:34285) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bztms-0002RO-VU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:08:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x244.google.com with SMTP id p136so7096715oic.1 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:08:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=rBWudaO1/Cf0q2fpPqWlgedO70vH3Lj2RVLOoSUmaQM=; b=lkEUqokhjE7PSzY6jf9MnPx0ql52vheKNftdGUy/W/ddnKIedHxtToUzUM7ZvfT/51 hDdRBaK5gmsgE7JK/KwNo41TYaKNaLbmWhHUUik+cLKg+veo+9U8cQW7Zt9nc9WJNhuU 578uaNiUYk5uAjJ1t5kngPz3jrGSLCF3fWjFAso+QkBju3Uj2NoSkqfHTxxOsyW15oE4 u+fsu4aWJ7WeGA8w+DqKYJk32sfg/T83Ps+gxvUbT/UXLWiwd1XnB9fVsIkLI9SwPSWq sqK5oMLXsVZQ3dakFTr3WLjw6B8OmgcAMfBPjRpywM5xYRPdvVnRR3yVUlKQpRnn7zvm nMsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rBWudaO1/Cf0q2fpPqWlgedO70vH3Lj2RVLOoSUmaQM=; b=b1T8fgYuHVBSvNxp9RV77XmJd4rY5UcTHezeWJAtjaKMWBDRHs1LRT3NqJ5L9/ONGA SBLjxcVp4tHruBty7qxWzdaKF1zwd8xnSO4fSfLDF3d2gZc1OFxoNbHVrWeoX2NBExWa A2TBibNEUVcNHt1IXTVO4Y6YMGLy5roL9Qmkn/tJarEOf1LsOVLyyFB4OkM3ZGaKhH/x LDUIDuWFpP3b/D5mtRGgIA/XeyCMxdSrrXZwOGUgo7W4HyR6aadlA4+jqHo3CgxDWVj2 XddehpsDCT9mFnCYCi0ucWCZOq2jRpqA5Zaa9U6eNUH9bAOMTybi/n2LLocGSA4nT33p ZUAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveioudODIJuQ5pvLVUXGJW7zh28iXAEhVJeDRqRv23GKwD4RCxj2S5SCkmz+ozlbuyeYTxaA9xoENNpBg== X-Received: by 10.157.7.231 with SMTP id 94mr8977871oto.2.1477609722335; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.29.239 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:08:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: H5BMTNybcKmEH1ikbPWGwYyfk5E X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::244 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208902 Archived-At: On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Noam Postavsky wrote: > > Actually, there are a few other similar issues in other parts of the > code, so you should to apply all of Sorry, I missed this one, it has to go first to let 71ca apply http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/patch/?id=9afea93ed536fb9110ac62b413604cf4c4302199 > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/patch/?id=71ca4f6a43bad06192cbc4bb8c7a2d69c179b7b0 > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/patch/?id=1047496722a58ef5b736dae64d32adeb58c5055c > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/patch/?id=96ac0c3ebce825e60595794f99e703ec8302e240 > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/patch/?id=43986d16fb6ad78a627250e14570ea70bdb1f23a > > (that last one is the same as what I told you earlier). Certainly just > using REL_ALLOC=no is simpler, but getting confirmation that the > patches work would be useful also. On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Herwig Hochleitner wrote: > The first patch doesn't apply against 25.1, but the remaining three seem to > fix rgrep for me. > > https://github.com/bendlas/nixpkgs/commit/8afa90d5ab591173b1cfdc149ab4cc9406a74982 > thanks