From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-26 b3e2073 4/4: Fix subproc listening when setting filter to non-t (Bug#36591) Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 12:21:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20190725223622.30077.68533@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190725223624.B5F4920C06@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87o90hypyo.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="154850"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Emacs developers To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 24 18:22:18 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i1Ynx-000eAv-Kx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:22:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38556 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i1Ynw-00011Z-Gd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 12:22:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i1Ynr-00011S-P9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 12:22:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i1Ynq-0001QB-Vj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 12:22:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::231]:43559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i1Ynq-0001Pk-PP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 12:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-x231.google.com with SMTP id y8so9233557oih.10 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 09:22:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nUU82k1VkdoQ8AAjROp9JUN0lL0Y4oKffOoMKJmIHzA=; b=cSieXHJTupgAcouddP+eMwN5Eb32CxEez5Mnremt8oJ23qU7q0pAkMwNfQ+p4SEyvU rznGkusXvand/YbIx93yrbVFDIdMTb18nHAPpqclCAnFdp/pbx8OR7ldX+PN0n/16g3Z QdaFH2x2upzII64ApdWVmwJ9PihyLsIshFELm7qPl1YypGs8+9uvYq9c8fNk++OIT2qL AHMoCymsv57lH90v3FEQ4OwZYelDnQimvGSDyvHjP7jnFuA6x6zw79P7n4taqxv9H/QQ /v8aKZqwo7NYygldG6q6M7YZv+IiHwXvCrST6VWzFI38z9nsFW2HVWC+/EdC2WcZUlXs 6S5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nUU82k1VkdoQ8AAjROp9JUN0lL0Y4oKffOoMKJmIHzA=; b=DasuCZF6d4tE5dfUrfoH/bnd/JxuONWnHgWz17hc1NWTRtKBmsM05bLO8Ht+vorWmK Ckq6PXykJ0S0gM2+9ia13PT4kjmhPCVrJIqlv8dBDm9b05FNidmkshGTVxfs0l7NpUXz S2gutgQ3Bd17DbpaacMYlQJ/LW1GiZWF/rYjsJjd+4zgfEkV+89zotmOLZrKSwwm5Oau HAEzSNS8ZYzSezWVtajlK4Lx7btI5x8gvbtQoW3rFUdbVOtEGtmIyAMqGV1FE06U/zet Yl4yCpXjgCTPCVdr3XTvDKiLX+wimG7eP0YiX6K/MGNzTNWunrtWfhnJvvD9vSykelzC 2j8g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXOJ8nmYCKozDso2+pnfjYVaFrd95unqpu4faFlIAfp30/0WPCU ORT+hmLsj65lsw0P/w+AaPt8+9ibEGHlzfgxUQs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyTMxaLKt3z3wWQ0B9DIb8b80gsyZw4AWL5jjY4XEpKeZFHN52767QK7MsF94pDIkkUS72qMYTOv5kXxq6jJoE= X-Received: by 2002:aca:4d4b:: with SMTP id a72mr6750619oib.87.1566663729816; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 09:22:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239536 Archived-At: On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 20:54, Noam Postavsky wrote: > Ah right, I wrongly assumed all the output would come in a single > chunk. Attached patch should fix it, should I push to emacs-26 since > tests are not included in the tarball release anyway? Or...? Since the emacs-26 branch is supposed to be frozen I've pushed to master for now.