From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it possible to change the recv buffer size dynamically for network process or subprocess? Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:02:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1de1c276-1bda-4ada-b3f4-7adaee296628@Spark> <837dz9c0n2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="20478"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: HaiJun Zhang , Emacs developers , Eli Zaretskii , Robert Pluim To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 26 18:04:02 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jHVvF-0005Aa-Tn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:04:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56736 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jHVvE-0000Rw-UC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:04:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38059) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jHVuB-0008FH-2T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:02:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jHVuA-00073X-1S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:02:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-x32a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a]:41412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jHVu8-00071G-K7; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:02:52 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id f52so6579815otf.8; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:02:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=P9Qg305zSMMDC82lG9p/39ms0bFdC9j97C+SydFIP0o=; b=aH+JNgJKBOJ72D5Fvj5YapL1ntbejczhayqebeNoxE1B6LsY//bsLHCV9ObH/Knkmr g2+oIPZy2yW2qfv0rV6n1CzQdam/ZJJ7CsH84ArDX5VGQ8cszzjP5JeRRcU3ODkTRE4H t2zrjKYHawBJNPAaf/dhywKrjkk3QAlKVTjAyHdM+fDtFugvYmpdK7/uwnaFFB3fOTdX SDYRzV2hAcnsMvaBoeglqCfjVnX7RlSBtghwTrL+LyNJmwYdZsPAt/RWrIRQ3HIy/X0g 3N4QHE9JLf5pjRRMqeWAuCieScr/R17yYkQS/M1l/v5QbWMJ/PhhPNDz9vcdeXmXaPfA PKsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=P9Qg305zSMMDC82lG9p/39ms0bFdC9j97C+SydFIP0o=; b=i+/mkEUu1QrRwJ9/FPaXgr1rdprH9byWqJIJYhPgTbPFvRD3MTMJoAq+5zxOOkFfMR pA/KpFrwSaKvcpwAM4VtSUDjjRX6AQjwKffYp+aKq+g1xoM7ugozgvd9u5tNp2PiuCVY 1+JGjMr6kTv9eXnfDrVpw/C8O8itpZ/cSrZS01fIqYIJxN7mnetet2TjogvKBlKC/N0s fTrZtZcrUppmYMqPQZz8yCzix+VcxVijFaJ9ZXMTyv7eGBANOKi3vcLyjrwbyGmM5LkT 0FD0pNuwbEO3gLcPFZ75JX8I3Wzg/QDmgCTNUFZbjVp0+lKPfNcceCNCfzXEs8JsqTDU L9NA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1Zy2pchyZnWP7LQhfM65KrQQld/eA3YLVa20w+wVsIi3LMUo3Y mk7OEnPMFtVw6a1jFrT8VnLP5p0aMXzqGHboJ7mTwwlrs9o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvZVM3v5xsagdmHImzqtEtcRQYPJJgZimX46E+oBo6x5d3Nh/EpfJW4PwkL95GJjkwExGsImbk3emFcQ2R7yt4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1b64:: with SMTP id d4mr6722202ote.368.1585242170713; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:02:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245812 Archived-At: On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 12:14, Stefan Monnier wrote: > We should maybe add a way to "suspend" processing the output of > a specific process (and calling `accept-process-output` with an > explicit process argument would override it). Doesn't setting the process-filter to t do this? (except for the override part, I guess) (set-process-filter PROCESS FILTER) Give PROCESS the filter function FILTER; nil means default. A value of t means stop accepting output from the process. [....]