From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: sendmail.el Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 23:04:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472267116 1749 195.159.176.226 (27 Aug 2016 03:05:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 27 05:05:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bdTvi-0008Li-4i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 05:05:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34527 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdTvf-0008Cq-EY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 23:05:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41067) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdTvY-0008CQ-JX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 23:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdTvW-0004YH-RG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 23:04:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]:34348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdTvU-0004Xt-Cu; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 23:04:56 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id l203so134707687oib.1; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:04:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=6lrsrihEHxolkB4ZvifQHG7AJN1KRvTufrkfDtX0ysw=; b=KfxxGLL0bHnz7M80eSrCaBUV+mb/lv8gVQ+1jt6cLxsUnUAdeAntJhZS5RAV3A5jG9 HVH+4E15L5jU1GzZ6iCiqbw4g7r4aaTPw0tXgMo7zRsEhyin0LoEVgJ+4vYHaHKaWQVv 2rh1uH6n7gLe3o9O6Mf4QXSW2FBeh4L8XdwZ4HsUctpzren6yr16XA+6qSLrlEQ524Tu J7/OwBl3VDH34xwdKZ0oFnDmBgkb7Rcf3Rsiw6oZp/vYWCV77M44OAyLqbiu8kCUet/V /iZghKhxjejTqelViOCPBIs8lVyGAp63/YaI6dv8Cu/Zfpc9MlcLwPgkR6M95P7rjXmc glXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6lrsrihEHxolkB4ZvifQHG7AJN1KRvTufrkfDtX0ysw=; b=d4yG2zTB9r43Fzq8pylIhvoyBgqOES/B1iAbkaz+yRiHgwbV8YldA/yrYwWS+2siLQ dE5YXsSJwaZUj+GAS97f17NHrpgqWtE4mGoGEHmHzTui9omWRKan1Pjtcjyng1mHD+mv /anWajaTwIeTukrxG49fwKDLM0FCbRnh2TGY+QKlRd+ijlWXzyFaXYkmWrfrYXgjYj8a 41J4goCwaWT1meAtZ8pOTDL1te/fcmaCsUc48Q1Mtp1O2SXtEhE9RwUINfnpZ5GuHaJJ sZk6NjxcgE+MvUOOmZbMeFLpXBUFTCrXKbKhxng085woU54xr9MVNZeO2gfvVmWxieUC XJRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMmdi6Nfl5l0rxlr+NloFgVb+M5qHN9K81zavOROgkyT/z3XvG/PsFKn3fvf+4eEMjcLB/CkxCvVMl5NA== X-Received: by 10.157.9.187 with SMTP id q56mr1547363otd.35.1472267095693; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:04:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.11.125 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:04:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: yO9C8u_emO_vAroQzZEqkca2Gds X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206824 Archived-At: On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > I think the problem is simply that old-point is the wrong place for > point to remain at. It needs to go back where it was in the search > loop, but old-point is where it was on entry to the function. Yes, after looking more at the surrounding code, I concur.