From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'. Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:17:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874m5lr92d.fsf@red-bean.com> <83eg4p9hqk.fsf@gnu.org> <87inu1ghud.fsf@red-bean.com> <83y42x7yud.fsf@gnu.org> <87poo8g2zi.fsf@red-bean.com> <7abf7a00-3f17-4ef6-bfbd-0f5df4e7acd6@default> <87twcutfqe.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475464673 8710 195.159.176.226 (3 Oct 2016 03:17:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 03:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams , Emacs developers To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 03 05:17:48 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqtlB-00016e-5a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 05:17:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33570 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqtl9-0004J1-D0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 23:17:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49186) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqtl3-0004It-7j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 23:17:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqtl1-0004nr-8M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 23:17:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]:35784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqtkx-0004ky-Ot; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 23:17:31 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id w11so187164280oia.2; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 20:17:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=6kj24i3mgSd07kxSG+0kW6QosTrzeelaOHWSzgGGELY=; b=gdgCDs/sioGDxompKPDfqFLwmB1lvxYGIAmKllTloND9BOIMr6m3j6DyGNIRbswYch Y8JOzRiNVYXBGoW+vAyv+eIpsqW4/H4CFJcZHq08MmnkrNfifhH7SgPEI5y1GC8d531C dt66q5iB5Iom46Uttc+TXdTZdB5CrQItVXvra2lJ73Vi62W7hDD36TuHriIHFcT/+E4V DDMqkpZZcpsFPIaI//+Kdun4CNZbxfyosD3G0Y1aSJe4GVUHU+YPd5JhzcWapc1iJQip hqkWiBFOJSdhAPyE0Kcev+h5Ixj7yQ/KUFxNW8LcwHNqSkf7HOMfTlks83ORYiRjDuyO LTFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6kj24i3mgSd07kxSG+0kW6QosTrzeelaOHWSzgGGELY=; b=R7qI6EgF1HFR0Zfnj/YzRlOGkC6unyzkjVp5OBWNMQeEtOz0f6DYmm7zDC5jjaCXHk ZJnY9bulf4+JAKFq2cwjSuwNKaLenkR9MStlAQ1Df7WGKTNMlYocSaNAhaS03Uz8Zsxq WIcixY+Q8Vc8e1vV/0DXlSKC7tx5f3d9sSgJ5ACssw9/YpelgFf7QJVNk1Q2U0gb7M/T CxM5L5r9Jg79BXdPoIsuReYZdOsz9YDh3kFQrD1SP/I57UQrXeMhmvf6PrIML6pfuzp4 mif+WwDzcvniQssLlaisBmkxErfvXGF0uOCm6Xnl4aEELW0JPJZJpRlQMG17LvpcPtCg LeEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkbNvEo94UytHXeVhi9Oq4GvGj7QEwt7to6hMIDTFJ7tt8WhSi3bUUVw1n2D/VRWT+xUcgPoX0ooYgZrA== X-Received: by 10.157.54.196 with SMTP id s4mr10684667otd.169.1475464651019; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 20:17:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.42.16 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 20:17:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87twcutfqe.fsf@red-bean.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: Yb5DJL2QnxonjmRqn71wtP5Fo-g X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207945 Archived-At: On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Karl Fogel wrote: > > I can't (re)close the bug, because it was closed earlier as "wontfix" and it now says "Bug is archived. No further changes may be made." It looks like the "wontfix" tag wasn't actually applied. You can send a message to with contents unarchive 286 tag 286 fixed quit To mark it as "fixed". See https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html for more options/details.