From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Various fixes for early init file changes Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 08:16:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1520601350 890 195.159.176.226 (9 Mar 2018 13:15:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:15:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Radon Rosborough Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 09 14:15:46 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1euHs8-00008d-IW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 14:15:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45221 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euHuB-00008k-8l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 08:17:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44704) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euHtG-000849-NX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 08:16:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euHtF-00060O-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 08:16:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]:39894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euHtE-00060G-QQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 08:16:52 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id t185so6920249oif.6 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 05:16:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ny94DgvjxaLzV5O1xrkv1apwzLcqUVADxxVZ32IjHts=; b=JGYzrwYtSarI50cElzhCIDsYE6+SiPn1JID3IR2I9z/6BtXFgSW+KtixPy+k0SHLYD 1Y1TGsoaTqgP5ZcNHJg2z0NrgttAj+RxHVbe9lbz3WKrq47fVOC+9xYlgkGUdqHNyOB5 gD6KIe89say9Hxc7g5zpoibJVH4grOjDE4NHvCBzXmzGmrFB2ky42OXU6TkQVrxZF9JJ 3X6Z+pcgUNNhy8owEuP1hWDBzANetbH2YIq5ILWBiZjrtw4XW87VyBV/DngbzERXJlHp OrIj87RbIWjeB2AnMmi6g/uzPo4kuR6oigyydAkQlBayZebCdQ/w6wFiwjBaHl6ChlLD tNuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ny94DgvjxaLzV5O1xrkv1apwzLcqUVADxxVZ32IjHts=; b=taMj//PTabNu3dCJKadYTlDC7Q8fhtUudm2V86+3kd22wCL6uxn5WKUYvy9RrSxfZD 7VWhhv5sUaYlQnIEGIJ1zIodNzTFGje5fQ227upe8gH/iytFQg4im+xmpb3tAxdZVlvv X1DNco7/l+t2C+kkYL3OCxV+7nx/rC6u0x2lXZ3Fntg0nWdsP54kZqUdgMomkuV7qxA9 EjrWlvAuHYOqTflUT4YmnVQduBqlKW554yVD2+PqNN5Bf6eiZFi64isef3xMx6IaQcuc V5Lrwa+4UELANmFIFOOrcDEWyjN8hoVYzBhgHYlOw7e7e2+PzOIym9n2TOmVfnQjecal q4SA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7E4oKB2NSZGLMV0pP8zLXbsvnVlLu+uRh8fYgPoGcCciLEkw4Ou YURqkVPCCiK1pjeR3W/f6BAZV9rlhlCkTXD5ka8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELul/ok0qA6ehEwzeGmtg2NoOK3lxnA53W0ij7kwTX5X1mkZldLDhGDEvaYnRm6fjDt21IWlbs9S8ciy5UqMeNs= X-Received: by 10.202.91.213 with SMTP id p204mr17571237oib.239.1520601412230; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 05:16:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.74.59.65 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 05:16:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:223538 Archived-At: On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:07 AM, Radon Rosborough wrote: >> the warning could be suppressed by adding '(package >> reinitialize) to warning-suppress-types instead of creating a new >> custom option. > > I just typed up a whole email explaining why it would be better for > novice users if the process for this was not so complicated. This reminded me that the *Warnings* buffer could use some enhancements (this is not directly related to your patches). I opened Bug#30757 for it. https://debbugs.gnu.org/30757