From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:13:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86tv2h2vww.fsf@gmail.com> <20200322123818.GB32470@ACM> <87eetk5swm.fsf@gnu.org> <20200326193128.GC14092@ACM> <86d08y4zsx.fsf@gmail.com> <83sghs7qdz.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7y63sjj.fsf@gnu.org> <834ku43c61.fsf@gnu.org> <83k12zz6ds.fsf@gnu.org> <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <83eet0sqb2.fsf@gnu.org> <0315ea48-8eb3-38fa-67c1-2e2170a65168@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="45646"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , =?UTF-8?B?YW5kcsOpcyByYW3DrXJleg==?= , Richard Stallman , Emacs developers To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 11 17:14:47 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jNHqJ-000BlF-3p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 17:14:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52658 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jNHqI-0004Tw-6q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:14:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jNHph-00043D-W4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:14:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNHpg-00076I-Rr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::242]:44742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNHpd-00075V-TI; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-x242.google.com with SMTP id o25so3818945oic.11; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 08:14:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nv72rh2fTUqMEcjQodolw2bOKgPvXhtF14NhlTqwP74=; b=W01XvdKVi1bvjzhZ2UA3u6uGeA1/8196WfUj/7mx+ULjqX58W9cBOo3AzrbZHuhTHG a1NomwgTn1ifMTqcj4zMvpP4vvX6QHBg+gZ1mOKN/xHV1cboc0C1dCG5z4BbVWqdEWPR 5KwP81nVrvnkkYnd3/VhoajB63t33gErrcVNIm9/mq9yKDNCNhai5KhJAoYY8g5ECKJr Wrtn0njyrK1FDR2ADayYPQI2rb93tkzaT9Q9VHPk3I+jyag5r3SKq7HUOUxdCU+6IeiR XyiQ9Ai/07XtmYq552Q/WhKuHmIIR9k+XlXYTVvFFFHqRPMTf5g9xgbnoXGHL5JhcxJZ QZ8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nv72rh2fTUqMEcjQodolw2bOKgPvXhtF14NhlTqwP74=; b=FH3okrtSiVXQunS5Ml/80FOg/Rk1f1ifJGio4SD6A96jy/isPgQfJ01kA9rfS+YWUs 2CQqhC6e+yyP8Cczl7g9eli0DeeiK94YSwb7bgcqQl+RB6SNhK27/UbnZmf2ihpab3iD HRnmEoq/uuXCsKoMk0WshjYeG1a5lbPDY9rP58iMmI4IfeExmYRYTGAoW6LZvJ3BA+e+ nP91OGMQWB+VoutvQMXxd8jChM556sBUFY1S5LM/BoKTL55yMdx07eHtIy6zE8haXIY9 3EYt/IisrpvfVoJPM+xnnNHg8gw7xiHT1V6i4CYPZFb1gZgUv5xgj038Dc4XjZg+loHj ojwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZkevVLT946SwHXXt4TOx4y5MbOP/B36AWisVcYfOm55N9VjC1s 9ojBQgBLtr4QiElBHKcHfnuPivLTgROXiiQt8II= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLtkojpt6o4xvdY9KKWtqZzpaJhUvw0uNreMmvdUanwFRtHf988m5b9DF6MQL18Qx4iwnmgZDZZEsxhT/o+jzk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:11:: with SMTP id u17mr3967180oic.87.1586618045042; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 08:14:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0315ea48-8eb3-38fa-67c1-2e2170a65168@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::242 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246836 Archived-At: On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 04:45, martin rudalics wrote: > So what I would vote for in this case is that font-lock would specially > highlight the open paren that "stops seeing the comment as comment" so > the user is aware of the fact. Would that be so hard to implement? > Even with a slight change in 'parse-partial-sexp' and 'syntax-ppss' that > would accompany it. Optionally, by default turned off, so nobody who > wants the correct syntactic interpretation would be bothered. I think Bug#21871 "Emacs Lisp Mode (at least): spurious parens in column 0 don't get bold red highlighting." is related. Perhaps the patch I posted at https://debbugs.gnu.org/21871#57 could help?