From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-26.0.91: switch-to-buffer-other-window runs too slowly (about 0.1s) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 19:15:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83efk6g93z.fsf@gnu.org> <544b8346-bda9-45eb-9573-1d51d9f768b2@Spark> <83bmfag8gu.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3ie24z1.fsf@gmail.com> <87sh8m23tc.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1ty22p1.fsf@gmail.com> <837epyg30w.fsf@gnu.org> <83370mg0qj.fsf@gnu.org> <5AB94021.8080700@gmx.at> <83vadiek9y.fsf@gnu.org> <5AB94724.1020609@gmx.at> <83tvt2ej3g.fsf@gnu.org> <5AB96925.6080709@gmx.at> <83muyudyg1.fsf@gnu.org> <5AB9F183.3060306@gmx.at> <83fu4jdxyp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522365222 27820 195.159.176.226 (29 Mar 2018 23:13:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 23:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: martin rudalics , Stefan Monnier , Ken Brown , Emacs developers To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 30 01:13:38 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f1gjh-00078z-7G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 01:13:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38826 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f1glk-0002hS-Ks for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 19:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59855) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f1gl9-0002ei-Cy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 19:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f1gl8-0000KP-F0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 19:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]:42945) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f1gl6-0000Iz-Tp; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 19:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id l190-v6so6550925oig.9; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:15:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gTpQB368WcBbydsfpQCKTJ3cI/gbfB5Lsc3zTh3o2uU=; b=hIXT8HWsskDSYMiqB33S6AsgWFk0DSsnGAZRSwWPlHZNis2I+Qnv8NbWWLYyWR1Y39 2XMgLut/Cjf23ZlEn3s45XUmDsbnBDB2K5JTx54R+q1htIGAOX8ik1r905BCErFDmYH7 zudAlr0MRiTSnkbHiRw9VRzaxnl5zgKAyVd5KGRvVYJdsI8S/AcSE24CSqpFWMyNnoCU 1fi18Y9MnppLCtlQlUOuwNT7r8wrSKKJdUx9s8UBFiyEziM5aZB4eHxSjy8+YX8uBLe2 jr0+QKEUJC+trcOiL2TU8gkVOuCFeejtW40+no09juUsuwBO40ExMszHtb9IT4U+zMHE scGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gTpQB368WcBbydsfpQCKTJ3cI/gbfB5Lsc3zTh3o2uU=; b=O29szQJh34cbt/FGJqS7a9MX9dXsSZ7bidO/3RGuVdqtlJJx08FUsMc5U5/1/TwthC FTScsTvTbvckgvBF5jnRKwnl0h31OCRqdYJQPRfeC547Pce3HGhqr/JTUUckDIl2SKGz b11ongmcrBrKTUnBX2yrj7Mh8zS9nzZoyyG/xotQx+DhLpZ+JLgNhVhlyZFe3UkJE4rI zYGkB7+Ucd2AbGmd1RWEEMspPD0uL9zS1y+Vgnr3OZ1jdt6y300Cpk6YIctA129nMYqF USmYiHyyXkuzatGymEcKH44zleIqtAFDdMtdb438sb32H2ofqqEI0joAZKcLxAsdiUP/ gP6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FBxuhg5y6iiiPJfg7GERVSSn1y6ZfegQUBWBxreEIpTaepcgsT rXd9zFXlmwDNxWkZh1Z8uaPmZ2sqrJcrGn+mNtnYbA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+iO9q7z0NHq9osCoKpN+R+1VbiXy6xR2iidK9adLVbokHb1SZyuu3OET3UoUjo/cdaoDVyI/O7bw1tAOSXjZ4= X-Received: by 10.202.168.14 with SMTP id r14mr2086309oie.17.1522365303162; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.74.139.213 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:15:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83fu4jdxyp.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224168 Archived-At: On 29 March 2018 at 05:37, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> All I meant was that if FRAME_VISIBLE_P says that the frame is visible >> we should use that and we will find out soon enough if it doesn't tell >> us the truth. > > Yes, agreed. > > Noam, would you like to push a change like that to master, please? Yup, done. [1: 2a192e21cf]: 2018-03-29 19:11:47 -0400 Don't wait for visible frames to become visible https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=2a192e21cf3b04b7f830b4971c1508c611e13a3c