From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sebastian Wiesner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 23:19:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20140102095347.6834E381D0C@snark.thyrsus.com> <87fvp6bdd9.fsf_-_@ktab.red-bean.com> <87bnzufkct.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ob3um5r8.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6a8d488e5e304ef042e40 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388701148 5256 80.91.229.3 (2 Jan 2014 22:19:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 22:19:08 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 02 23:19:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vyqbj-00005a-Bn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:19:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47221 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vyqbi-0005nt-Qd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:19:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vyqbe-0005ne-9T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:19:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vyqbc-0003qE-Vz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:19:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qe0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22b]:41692) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vyqbc-0003po-Qg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qe0-f43.google.com with SMTP id jy17so14998390qeb.30 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:19:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=AKB6SnBsNT9iz77YF8F+oFyCOSot8Sc+3E+/RtE8RXc=; b=n65l3rb6t9nW15N2j+4Esx8ZQLRuoUaJpPuNd6wdd7vrK5ow7KrB3XBBzkFrdFTluy J3YAM0Req/aO506PvUwsIlXkjHa8KU6Zj6jU+8V3noMD2I4AeSi7dZ95+N09noVYIzCs YkMegzKP9DquVSufIHzB7ZDN6XeEv4yy9pk97vtDKnpAK3n68VuDLoiBI4NKk1Ajt3Yo +fz+mzfKCQCYgYSFUVABQZ44YxmX7jfmvtpSJeTZX963aEtsIgeROtRRuAT7Na7A7HBG m+W3vprMilh/qEIqwVeYBpEd3+U/6DzdG37tk59aE3tNMwUDboQ/ntMNZd4xKmoJWqU3 MYBg== X-Received: by 10.49.27.234 with SMTP id w10mr144506147qeg.22.1388701146472; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:19:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.224.207.73 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:19:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.224.207.73 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:19:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ob3um5r8.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167091 Archived-At: --047d7bd6a8d488e5e304ef042e40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Am 02.01.2014 22:30 schrieb "Mitchel Humpherys" : > > On Thu, Jan 02 2014 at 07:56:34 AM, Bastien wrote: > > Karl Fogel writes: > > > >> Does anyone think we should stay on bzr, or choose a VCS other than > >> git? > > > > +1 for using Git. > > +1 > > I recently submitted my first (trivial) patch to Emacs. It was painful > enough to deter me from making a few other changes that I've wanted to > make recently... In contrast, I shoot off "drive-by" patches to > third-party Elisp projects about once a week because it's dead simple > with Git. I know that I could become proficient in bzr with a little > effort but it's just not worth the time investment since there are only > 2 or 3 projects that I care about using bzr, while everyone else is > using git. +1 That's exactly the situation I found in. I contributed my first patch some weeks ago, and found Bazaar alone daunting enough to put me off making any further contributions. > > > -- > Mitch > --047d7bd6a8d488e5e304ef042e40 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am 02.01.2014 22:30 schrieb "Mitchel Humpherys" &l= t;mitch.special@gmail.com>= ;:
>
> On Thu, Jan 02 2014 at 07:56:34 AM, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-= bean.com> writes:
> >
> >> Does anyone think we should stay on bzr, or choose a VCS othe= r than
> >> git?
> >
> > +1 for using Git.
>
> +1
>
> I recently submitted my first (trivial) patch to Emacs. It was painful=
> enough to deter me from making a few other changes that I've wante= d to
> make recently... In contrast, I shoot off "drive-by" patches= to
> third-party Elisp projects about once a week because it's dead sim= ple
> with Git. I know that I could become proficient in bzr with a little > effort but it's just not worth the time investment since there are= only
> 2 or 3 projects that I care about using bzr, while everyone else is > using git.

+1

That's exactly the situation I found in.=C2=A0 I contrib= uted my first patch some weeks ago, and found Bazaar alone daunting enough = to put me off making any further contributions.

>
>
> --
> Mitch
>

--047d7bd6a8d488e5e304ef042e40--