From: "João Távora" <joaotavora@gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
dancol@dancol.org, casouri@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
theo@thornhill.no
Subject: Re: treesit indentation "blinking"
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:00:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALDnm53DK_0==Bt7-QH4srNgzT9TjU3wseMMVOUjief2LyWZxg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d8df485-adcb-64f3-742f-37c9a9a40f65@yandex.ru>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 10:36 AM Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> wrote:
>
> On 30/03/2023 12:28, João Távora wrote:
> > This problematic already counts as "bouncing" to me, for some meaning of
> > "bouncing". c++-mode doesn't behave like that because indentation is
> > already where it is supposed to be if you type that sequence of
> > keystrokes.
>
> Okay, if that's what you meant.
>
> I think this one (indentation after RET in an incomplete function
> definition) should be fixed in the indentation rules. The contents of
> electric-indent-chars won't fix it either way.
This is all down to indentation rules, that's how electric-indent-mode
decides what to do. My point is that having electric-indent-chars be
this ambitious with "broken" indentation rules isn't a good place to
be.
What counts as "broken" indentation is also arguable though. When dealing
with invalid programs, there is really no "right" or "wrong" indentation.
See my message https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62412#14 where
I show cases where c++-ts-mode's answer to indenting an invalid program
makes more sense than c++-mode's answer.
Whatever the indentation rules, the current bouncing is so jarring
that it really doesn't encourage people to try switching to
c++-ts-mode, get used to its set of indentation rules, and then perhaps
experience its other benefits like, say, performance or simplicity.
At least it didn't for me. I'm back to c++-mode atm.
In my opinion electric-indent-char should be reduced to the default
and should be added criteriously as the indentation rules they trigger
are fixed.
João
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-22 20:49 treesit indentation "blinking" Daniel Colascione
2023-03-23 0:00 ` Yuan Fu
2023-03-23 0:07 ` Daniel Colascione
2023-03-23 1:02 ` Yuan Fu
2023-03-23 4:51 ` Daniel Colascione
2023-03-23 20:04 ` Yuan Fu
2023-03-23 21:10 ` Daniel Colascione
2023-03-23 21:24 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-03-25 9:05 ` João Távora
2023-03-25 12:42 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-03-25 14:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-25 16:18 ` João Távora
2023-03-28 22:11 ` João Távora
2023-03-28 23:57 ` Daniel Colascione
2023-03-29 2:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-29 22:30 ` João Távora
2023-03-29 22:37 ` Herman, Géza
2023-03-29 23:25 ` João Távora
2023-03-30 7:47 ` Herman, Géza
2023-03-29 22:56 ` Lynn Winebarger
2023-03-30 7:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-30 8:58 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-03-30 9:15 ` João Távora
2023-03-30 9:06 ` João Távora
2023-03-30 9:20 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-03-30 9:28 ` João Távora
2023-03-30 9:36 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-03-30 10:00 ` João Távora [this message]
2023-03-30 16:29 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-03-30 17:14 ` João Távora
2023-03-30 10:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-30 10:26 ` Herman, Géza
2023-03-30 13:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-30 15:03 ` Herman, Géza
2023-03-30 14:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-01 19:39 ` Yuan Fu
2023-04-02 1:49 ` Yuan Fu
2023-04-02 5:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-02 14:26 ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-04-02 15:48 ` João Távora
2023-04-02 17:04 ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-04-02 17:23 ` João Távora
2023-04-02 17:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-02 18:04 ` João Távora
2023-04-02 18:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-02 21:38 ` João Távora
2023-04-02 21:21 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-04-02 21:40 ` João Távora
2023-04-03 9:59 ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-04-03 10:28 ` João Távora
2023-04-03 12:07 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-04-03 12:56 ` Alan Mackenzie
2023-04-03 20:58 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-04-03 21:59 ` Daniel Colascione
2023-04-03 22:10 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-04-04 8:31 ` João Távora
2023-04-07 14:20 ` Daniel Martín
2023-04-08 1:32 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-04-08 2:42 ` Yuan Fu
2023-04-08 18:59 ` Daniel Martín
2023-04-03 21:47 ` parser error recovery algorithm vs " Stephen Leake
2023-04-04 12:01 ` John Yates
2023-04-04 13:40 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-04-04 16:00 ` Stephen Leake
2023-04-04 13:50 ` Stephen Leake
2023-04-04 14:05 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-03-30 11:05 ` João Távora
2023-03-30 14:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-30 14:43 ` João Távora
2023-03-30 14:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-30 15:42 ` João Távora
2023-03-25 16:14 ` João Távora
2023-03-24 11:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALDnm53DK_0==Bt7-QH4srNgzT9TjU3wseMMVOUjief2LyWZxg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=joaotavora@gmail.com \
--cc=casouri@gmail.com \
--cc=dancol@dancol.org \
--cc=dgutov@yandex.ru \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=theo@thornhill.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).