From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: OK to put lisp/progmodes/flymake.el in ELPA as a :core package? Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 14:53:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87k1knwlpu.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000d4b2e057c5ba971" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1544107896 28261 195.159.176.226 (6 Dec 2018 14:51:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 14:51:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 06 15:51:32 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gUv00-0007Em-3W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 15:51:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41347 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUv26-00048U-HE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 09:53:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUv1t-00048D-Pp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 09:53:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUv1p-00085C-3f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 09:53:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]:37476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUv1o-00084x-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 09:53:25 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id z16so799338qtq.4 for ; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 06:53:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rvupzMFbmbpRs9/lWp55f3LrfPFkuuEMR5VSpgkUY04=; b=mT4DyWCvCfbPTb4/cv9XsC+Z5SQb9PcBHGe66nN3Hq/g7zmPmu+jN8DzJc8AYlc4sK fkv6Ar8Py6pwYEZuBuc1ONyrZnoAbXmMCUPbWmS47VSHyCNh0lqetndtvC0S7j7C9d2V agwNRyiqDqAaXbRC0NKBjMK9Cy65nv/wzXf01eq0gklqucp8LyDaq/RbGUZUfrXdWDhf ZrnS+02NTJBqhk6NhmnsQ+GqoeG0rUfZ80T/K8fXnUpVe6wHAjt4NB/O5wbbc08BTH1V AAKnfmWsmQDz68wiGM43BaHNdrXZRYIuUq2WVFeOcGRzzP0vm49/3Kt6+WAEkHGwt8Tk 6tVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rvupzMFbmbpRs9/lWp55f3LrfPFkuuEMR5VSpgkUY04=; b=Kwzk04tX+yp7ZZYorle+b7fgFeZlNQJA+3w2UvtBCpVXcBv8+0odw6pMzKDNlgw1iB cbiY23JgfGM0MHXVRnjRppWD9zxJgOIoVdJoXqO1kcTdi7DJH2KNxkedpbEld7SrNd8q w9IDAIA4NK/r2QEi5csm8iXM/AvMQLlae2c5kE6S9fs6z2VRLgpLs+5sjxVmA5XhzDln qlioaFehKfPlSyb9rlhi76Lzv6G30lutrw/6sHAXzvHY3VckpIVQTy6FwfKceAZrCycu 60ozjzbTprM5nCrBy/YruGOhp+hPMh1a8gErG8O9jUmhvw/rKSVuBUYzMw81lxzc5p2P buWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWaxI4pBpTI+YAGrmw5E6zbB/K2avQTJF2iLvM/BFNgWnpDxOsKK fM+oPXdXz0T4UC3nVmum101J0CBATvPjfWXOM/w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WMnybCwB5IAMoBqw0pSSEM85gAgvWWEU0pvtbHpp++mz1qC6JIOqK0kIoyqO/YbUneLubYjlvPYVjqiR1+mlE= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3e91:: with SMTP id y17mr28431023qtf.390.1544108003638; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 06:53:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231683 Archived-At: --0000000000000d4b2e057c5ba971 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 6, 2018, 13:03 Stefan Monnier > Should it be a separate function? Package-install-most-recent or packag= e > > upgrade? > > Maybe a new `package-get-latest`, so you can do > > (package-install (package-get-latest)) > > Especially if package-get-latest can be extracted from existing code > (and hence used there was well). But won't that upgrade all the packages? Or would you give package-get-latest it an optional arg PACKAGE? Jo=C3=A3o --0000000000000d4b2e057c5ba971 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, = Dec 6, 2018, 13:03 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
> Should it be a separate function? Package-install-most-recent = or package
> upgrade?

Maybe a new `package-get-latest`, so you can do

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 (package-install (package-get-latest))

Especially if package-get-latest can be extracted from existing code
(and hence used there was well).
=
But won't that upgrade all the packages? Or= would you give package-get-latest it an optional arg PACKAGE?

Jo=C3=A3o
--0000000000000d4b2e057c5ba971--