I don't think so. It could, somewhat but would be akward. Gerd's suggestion
is much a much more natural way to solve this bike shed. At the Lisp symbol
level, at least. At the package level (as in Elisp .el  file names) it does
nothing for this particular semiotic bike shed.

João

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022, 08:43 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 07:25:19 +0200
> > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com
> > From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> >
> >  > At the very least, we should consider adding some alias, like
> >  > `start-lsp', and/or `lsp-start'.[2]
> >
> > Wouldn't it be nice if Emacs had CL packages?  Then everyone could add
> > superior names as a package nickname.  That would make bikeshedding much
> > easier :-).
>
> Does shorthands.el fit the bill?
>