On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:40 PM Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:

> João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I'm in favor of tweaking the heuristic and applying it only to macro
> > definitions, which are (or should be) the majority of definition
> > creating forms.
>
> In-tree, there are more 2x as many macros that are called def* than
> functions, and of those functions, about half of them really wants to
> have (indent defun).  (And most of the macros, but not all.)
>
> So the macro/function thing is significant, but not compelling.


I'm sorry I couldn't parse this.  I sense you're trying to make
some kind of argument backed by statistics, but I cannot
understand it.  Can you explain again in some more detail,
for my benefit?.

Maybe with a short example for each of the classes you
mentioned.  And in-tree counts for each of those classes.

Thanks,
João