From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BIKESHED: completion faces Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 13:29:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87zhhaxalt.fsf@gmail.com> <83bltpgffr.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv7gg9oz.fsf@gnu.org> <83r22kg8pa.fsf@gnu.org> <20191106205133.njij3ve7qqy7yh3q@Ergus> <83ftizg4nr.fsf@gnu.org> <8336ezg2vm.fsf@gnu.org> <83wocbelu1.fsf@gnu.org> <83imnvegcp.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftizeelw.fsf@gnu.org> <83bltne6oq.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfsrqs63.fsf@gmail.com> <838soqeuzr.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftiyn07t.fsf@gmail.com> <8336eycvpf.fsf@gnu.org> <83pni2bcws.fsf@gnu.org> <83imnubax9.fsf@gnu.org> <83h83eb8od.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0e2b32k.fsf@gnu.org> <83r22ha64z.fsf@gnu.org> <831ruh9siv.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2wp8cnq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="53771"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Ergus , Dmitry Gutov , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 09 14:31:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTQpc-000DqA-5z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 14:31:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36852 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTQpa-0005CS-7P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 08:31:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTQoD-0005CI-Q1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 08:29:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTQoC-00076x-PB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 08:29:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]:42237) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTQoB-00076M-CT; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 08:29:43 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id k13so971182ioa.9; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 05:29:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LoxKdNItjYl3F+bEN207o1UmabaSLu8Yh0ormikIkSw=; b=Ryw+U+mvJSeEHgI7VMurC5CwVXkD0m9GoAgJ3I4BQteCQN6cTN+39HY38+ryrIjILh uROlTmFM6XOkI2PxevnFc8GF9Oq6gwhhI/nMLf5Xj34A3t+GguyYUBsTaXvknDcJtl1k 2TD4SD6GLLVYvWhj7htGCVEYOxHJ5/zD1qzxORqDTZH+uE/c1dp9I1E7vgDV1yuS3EcF wsX0zHOxuBUBFM+IHF6HkgTBNuaxvbEk6JFaFfmzbEntR98N99l2UDp/KtVX4Md4neii YQhH8hLlfcr5+sg9/RlgS1CvJfSzT5Kwjr0pu+OrW26ypvQOJrAqf4GofvQfuPzbVJ1f GKDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LoxKdNItjYl3F+bEN207o1UmabaSLu8Yh0ormikIkSw=; b=ombmTxYebwnjfl/G0BCuzQFknjkVuph0YFeqjZsoFfKuDTwu2kGtgQppzr3MDbJAip ZzRsv0oeastg0rtX2XWuRAFwnNW74Fbna41hBCF4FAd4hpMuMq4ExmQ9mtjuzWDRBlY5 QAxxb59PVTH+o+iB6LXFiG6lBJKJMmKgHUWtTyVSD3E4me00adxoY42yNiMQSxgHfgTh LysS+DYNYbtSdoeDGVNpz5bujMT6tkLwU5v7MNJ43RVYti1U2KqhkUhCJu/SIBI0+h0N kKRez4ibQOYW2k9cad6Ir0hzKWePseaQewSOTJAlw6k2Zedy/TVjwR+TbFKqpG95K7ke dRTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX0dfU3sRAhy23dOzjFYVMe62MnzPgAm+aG25LzcDW5yfsP/XL+ xQp/7iCnyYK9j5C3BMFAh0h7KtzTljppywMYJ+UlUFoR X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwbJTATD+IsmVErnmbVa6dgc5G6CNUVsf9R+kEpAwldQycZ3qSHKKcKYQFmgDXKw3fsvJf3sFQwd1K/iDAMAqc= X-Received: by 2002:a02:742a:: with SMTP id o42mr16431963jac.24.1573306182263; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 05:29:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83y2wp8cnq.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242041 Archived-At: On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 12:20 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I explained above what I meant by "reversal". And you agreed, so why > are we still arguing about this part? Because, with all do respect, I don't want to mischaracterize what I agreed on. I was clarifying exactly what I think. I don't have to agree just for agreement's sake. I believe those things that I wrote. If there's agreement, fine, if there isn't then fine, too. > It's up to you, but I think an option that causes the matched part to > be prominent and the next character to type not prominent (which is > AFAIU what you want) is much easier and lightweight for users than > loading a theme or customizing a face. I do believe loading a theme is much simpler than asking the user to set an option for such a minute aspect. I load themes because I trust many such good decisions of the theme's author: I don't want to worry about individual ones. If I ever do, I'll customize a face. Faces and variables that control application of faces are, in my humble opinion of course, crazy. Even for Emacs :-) Jo=C3=A3o