From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_T=E1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (unknown) Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 18:58:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8761wn1znp.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51dd56dd6eec504e0db916e X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373133565 21371 80.91.229.3 (6 Jul 2013 17:59:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 17:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 06 19:59:27 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UvWlb-0000HQ-4C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 19:59:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37901 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvWla-0001Eu-R3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 13:59:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55609) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvWlW-0001Ep-RS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 13:59:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvWlR-0005vW-V8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 13:59:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234]:36664) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvWlR-0005vC-Nf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 13:59:17 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 10so2822073pdi.11 for ; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=tZt7hmWzCMdt3VacxjE+XbjQ+m1N2HC2qN+qvCthvVQ=; b=TSn4BGqPw8AIcMBYdh56oo2o6DpgRZ0UsYW80Stxm/1aNci1f+EZIGD9Hs2l7MnRNm B1M1Cz/JzZz4/XOhpOV9Z54Gc5KZ60TsSMXlJq0Gg/QugKE/ktqS+MFYkAOofPkgDAcB UWmkIUnfYIwM04dbgANBfAVCOEBFARD+y+huO+JP1r2dOXpJVlWJ9dW8uedBSsyiKCqB BMUYavvJyHD/My2SCNUTaqzATOwftwkgu+CT4FJgt5t37XeVwUgmnRN9zJQDe6jplQqQ iBleqXZ1rqNz5ScPrR2t0l1A80o2XOjTWMTJbbrlSDlp2F85xYtLoR+wVAh5xpNwuuY3 NHLw== X-Received: by 10.66.5.195 with SMTP id u3mr15819520pau.79.1373133556081; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.68.235.38 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 10:58:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8761wn1znp.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161675 Archived-At: --bcaec51dd56dd6eec504e0db916e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I see, so the difference between "r" and "R" is just for the current "summary mode" session. Curious, when does adaptive scoring kick in then? It does differentiate between "r" and "R" doesn't it? Thanks (and sorry for not including a subject, I stupidly forgot) Jo=E3o On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Jo=E3o T=E1vora writes: > > > To the question: Does it make sense to not use gnus-ancient-mark "O" > > completely? I want to see old marks that I laboriously set in previous > > sessions, such as the gnus-del-mark "r" mark. It seems to be replaced > > by "O" all the time. > > "r" just marks stuff as read, and this isn't saved beyond that. Any way > of marking stuff as read ends up in the same data set, so it's all > displayed as "O". > > -- > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) > bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ > --=20 Jo=E3o T=E1vora --bcaec51dd56dd6eec504e0db916e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I see, so the difference between "r" and "R" is just fo= r the current "summary mode" session.

Curious,= when does adaptive scoring kick in then? It does differentiate between &qu= ot;r" and "R" doesn't it?

Thanks (and sorry for not including a subject, I stupid= ly forgot)
Jo=E3o

On Sat, Jul 6= , 2013 at 4:22 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
Jo=E3o T=E1vora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:

> To the question: Does it make sense to not use gnus-ancient-mark "= ;O"
> completely? I want to see old marks that I laboriously set in previous=
> sessions, such as the gnus-del-mark "r" mark. It seems to be= replaced
> by "O" all the time.

"r" just marks stuff as read, and this isn't saved beyond tha= t. =A0Any way
of marking stuff as read ends up in the same data set, so it's all
displayed as "O".

--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
=A0 bloggy blog = http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/



-- Jo=E3o T=E1vora
--bcaec51dd56dd6eec504e0db916e--