On Sun, Oct 24, 2021, 17:55 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > João Távora writes: > > > Unless I'm mistaken there are NO macros whose name starts 'def' for > > which we DON'T want to indent their uses like a `defun`. > > As I've said repeatedly, you are mistaken. There's > `define-thing-chars', for instance. > Ok. Finally an example. It's that a macro? If so, it's the first time you provide an example. This is why I asked you for data earlier. Then i'd day say to add a debug spec to define-thing-chars. Probably you already did. Doesn't change my point. Even ifyou're holding on to a bunch more of these examples (are you?), there's still the fact that you're breaking indentation of out-of-tree code. João >