Hi Robert, On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 1:21 PM Robert Pluim wrote: > all the defcustomʼs in eglot.el lack a :version tag. Is that > intentional? No really, probably oversight and the fact that Eglot being a GNU ELPA package (presumably easy to upgrade) doesn't usually mean such version tags are so important. That and the fact that Eglot doesn't really have that many defcustoms. So, if you want to add :version tags, go ahead. Note that Eglot does GNU ELPA double-duty as a :core package, so not sure what you should put there, but others are perhaps better informed than me. João