From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What's missing in ELisp that makes people want to use cl-lib? Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:01:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: <871qd8sfdx.fsf@posteo.net> <838r7g8pys.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkcbrgnr.fsf@posteo.net> <25924.21015.19614.951576@orion.rgrjr.com> <87bkc4jpja.fsf@dataswamp.org> <12da6bcb-1818-7fbe-12af-8d4607724332@gutov.dev> <87il6bt4z0.fsf@yahoo.com> <8734xetjkk.fsf@yahoo.com> <87cywhsrcf.fsf@yahoo.com> <87cywgx1z0.fsf@web.de> <83wmuowwp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83cywgwg3z.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2574"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 11 14:58:52 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r1oVg-0000S2-76 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:58:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r1oVP-0002Z2-RX; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:58:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r1oVP-0002Yf-1h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:58:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r1oVN-0004RD-Cr; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:58:34 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-507a5f2193bso3275634e87.1; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 05:58:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1699711111; x=1700315911; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=KNWFcRqlGqpfwxAqnnwK2WX+HeV2mE0kxjcKXIC36OA=; b=fQBvjinhCiU42mFW/2b2WcrDrtCUg6fYcNv2u+ubow2kLHllKg8j9ZMLvd7nX0tpQF d59DA1JVQnxQzhIc7p9T7Jesj8XHV0Xy60371s4tKzFTJdr6LwDyvc9+y4WSzB3tU3Uk ECnTdOfMsGCOEvfazevB5l+lLAx81rPXMGdUx3RSYP72gJDscY1zELC/jvF8+POwqDEX ta8BEDcQ5/M7vp2ZBQI7FcsxbIdfiPk9FsX1QykOyoY+Xv1Bu+diRhCvvOCOcgofk5p0 N1X8C8ryjc3KBhXxhsmzUJxWyQ/MyEseLvyjEOjodj/S9O1p69kXWtIRFdFP/0AmPu8c gtNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699711111; x=1700315911; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KNWFcRqlGqpfwxAqnnwK2WX+HeV2mE0kxjcKXIC36OA=; b=rO3Eljj3RXSV/6xleP0A1dyB3hZmuXBfzwgcCrvJbTin9ObjEorqWH+LSXWaC+9WvL 1bb9aFTy33so9SA0t3YL0QyIYQ0huFZef87Shs1JYvJOEcYd+Sr3sYIpUhHHANnxxaj9 xnYYoYlpXjQQZA45aQdZLMvyOuQU8kWYjZYYp2TFlhjM0xT6CHFqAENlJygLB9UxMc5b 1alVp10CrtPB6DdovgjOHDxcpNIiQdpGTfxl8kio4/sSkXbJksntAvAcbjagkvSHKu/c 5VNLkk5SbWezSYVNxQ/yBw1IWcRZRW8dGxHHkJzHJ4RIWrYIPXjqCfj2oWgEfBobqbr5 PcFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzjg98OfzX9nIU09N/JR9rm7/QUH15MT01NhSNI7CKFBjkR39+u 6sSPenPXb88tBIGwI7CO8KtCTI7rL2lOqrywjdvmMjFtT/A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFLDPRFM1znJLSdsplfdcKwnNo+HpJWpn1yKO1P0tHg3VZk9cSAut6HkZACffIHyp4PfZyvnl0pDt0BO59pZLc= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4853:0:b0:507:cc09:59ab with SMTP id 19-20020ac24853000000b00507cc0959abmr742431lfy.9.1699711110551; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 05:58:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83cywgwg3z.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::12d; envelope-from=joaotavora@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x12d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:312570 Archived-At: On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 1:54=E2=80=AFPM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > I generally agree with the goal of bringing in cl-lib.el ideas into > > core, but it must be said here that seq.el, despite being a sequence > > processing library, should NOT be viewed as a drop-in replacement > > for cl-lib.el counterparts > > That (and the rest of your message) completely misses my point, and > doesn't even belong to this discussion, to tell the truth. I think addressed your suggestion to have "similar or identical implementation [to cl-lib.el] in the likes of [..] seq.el" quite directly. So I don't understand your criticism of my contribution, but fair enough, I think I don't have much more to say on the matter anyway.