From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eglot-test-diagnostic-tags-unnecessary-code fails with certain clangd versions Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:57:25 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87edq7ztks.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87jzziuzba.fsf@gmail.com> <87pm9a5n14.fsf@yahoo.com> <87bkkuulp5.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn3h4gld.fsf@yahoo.com> <87o7oru7i1.fsf@gmail.com> <87ttyj3i3u.fsf@yahoo.com> <87a6071xxt.fsf@yahoo.com> <87bkknr7io.fsf@gmail.com> <87355zqzbh.fsf@gmail.com> <87pm92pmtn.fsf@gmail.com> <87lejqp7zc.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87h6uep63a.fsf@gmail.com> <87fs9yqhk4.fsf@gmx.de> <87355yqfsb.fsf@gmx.de> <87y1nqp09x.fsf@gmx.de> <875yauoyfo.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7668"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Michael Albinus , Po Lu , emacs-devel To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 21 17:58:00 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pefJA-0001qC-CQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:58:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pefIu-0007lm-TU; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:57:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pefIr-0007l8-9f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:57:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::236]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pefIp-0002k8-JM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:57:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-x236.google.com with SMTP id e4so4741631oiy.10 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:57:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679417856; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=z20uvn6jUJFMyqHOzaMYU2Hmlr6GoA6Pek0/XbORxzE=; b=QraK1yycTS7I8gaBrh5Z96NZ9LHNOv2rP0DE2e7ZgnRHrjz/Lsreq9gr86cxTP4GaA TUcHyHSqG3ejbTPSzSsrwY0Wb2TNa6i5sXqGtZaRheCZXC0tScItWHi6xrPlmGajrTts wPxGVGTGJGY6U04C04NY+8JIXzji3FVwDCmlqFAr51DLXXAbttFcfEdBXvfvtAWOOete i9cEAVWyJJOWQOilTzoJDBTdDHj1mZIsvq7C/cs+4q+rDBtzAsykBbd8phexfHqn175X KifG/ytIUtGj21yNolSRcVV0NL1YytfuWlonOISgpgqtHw08iVwtNReUwi1rVT9o0HAF xXKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679417856; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=z20uvn6jUJFMyqHOzaMYU2Hmlr6GoA6Pek0/XbORxzE=; b=xa7DFD0Cb2s9U2BTnWiXCdUY6mSFUZlYZceQkzEmZZ23bbt1VGRlLyzwBQZhtm1XLL pqWZNesQQc2AfFKUAttHp8AaQWixEzVQ0tGNyYT7HgCsJtS0yHWwPj0Kcwlmg0sU5Q0f 62k59Y4BcF1/PCZoZCJLSrg9C8g4CEkIUXqal7jdO7pgQf7Zf6Hmh5kUpi+HKKA1QqXv SCVgEsZtjHGoB8pciG6NmwFFQ5S9i94RlgavVZNT1PBAEL358osW0UWJeY/PdMOsIUp5 uHwsB8fELi8h7wsmZDFEXgceX+Rzmadb9LLYk9iinWAVnC9a+i4R5z0ttPLxn/i/rQPB 1irA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVX670Sb0BcMVJJY19aPr6+ngwJX6rvcQNNkrGcP4ZIZ5Vfwprl 7iLyEgGdEecrIImrhMLun7zEmuTP5vRV+biOfDQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/gMDOAG7Xo7dzRHIVhMTUhyGR7/D9u6LUc7ecNfT2n1ll+BGgzAMBHYbC33eVUiZ/FLYccIXleVU3Cs3GtgJE= X-Received: by 2002:aca:d0e:0:b0:384:6d14:c707 with SMTP id 14-20020aca0d0e000000b003846d14c707mr799930oin.5.1679417856615; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:57:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <875yauoyfo.fsf@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::236; envelope-from=joaotavora@gmail.com; helo=mail-oi1-x236.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304672 Archived-At: On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 4:34=E2=80=AFPM Robert Pluim wro= te: > > >>>>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:26:14 +0000, Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora said: > > Jo=C3=A3o> I don't think the test should be marked unstable, as it is= not > Jo=C3=A3o> really that: it's pretty stable. So let's install Robert'= s > Jo=C3=A3o> upcoming patch (using version<=3D and a helper) > > I won=CA=BCt get to that today. I can get to that later, but I have no useful way to test. > Jo=C3=A3o> and considering upgrading > Jo=C3=A3o> clangd soon via one of those methods. It's not very usefu= l to have > Jo=C3=A3o> a version of clangd in EMBA that doesn't represent very we= ll what > Jo=C3=A3o> people are using. > > I run Debian stable because it=CA=BCs, well, stable, and I suspect many > others do as well, so having clangd not be the latest and greatest is > not going to be unusual. I don't think so. Clangd is not a web server where stability is paramount, it's a developer's tool, so I would suppose a newer version is what's needed. My experience with Eglot+clangd users tells me so overwhelmingly. Jo=C3=A3o