On Sun, Dec 25, 2022, 07:03 <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote:

To add confusion to this, I'm a somewhat "in between" type and find
> the Lisps ambiguity quite charming. If I had to describe where I
> see myself, I'd say "functional in the large, indulging imperatives
> in the small" or something.


Yes, quite. Is it a good time to ask, since we're all huggy wuggy about
Lisp's inclusive style, why the new Scheme stuff gets a namespacing hall
pass while the CL stuff was all banished to akward prefix-land?

João

>