From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 17:28:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <97DA7804-F647-4A1D-B8E0-AFFE7A324C64@gmail.com> <15bc138f-1c12-d8d2-7174-12a243030634@yandex.ru> <609f9461-8c02-dcf4-773d-562b8d1f717c@gmail.com> <834ksrj62j.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="40614"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment_Pit=2DClaudel?= , ilya.ostapyshyn@gmail.com, Yuan Fu , emacs-devel , Dmitry Gutov , ndame To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 08 18:29:42 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jX5sc-000ATq-0y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 18:29:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59434 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX5sa-0003ah-Vy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 12:29:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX5s3-0002qG-Hk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 12:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]:46997) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX5s2-0000T4-Nm; Fri, 08 May 2020 12:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id j8so2341913iog.13; Fri, 08 May 2020 09:29:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fYcmY624lNkGuFKFGdgyXxwfE5QyiBxuT1wzA9VOpaI=; b=VvpIJGkZAGik5HkyZdya548H3ZgstFP/y744huVF4Hq8craJ+WydVDh8IfsCK1ZqqA v7lIwswiMbXBfCpg/+Fe+ZtJfMRXSmyL62+sGFYXZbtlcBmIMrubH+01FanWfR+HVSl3 6BinEOtMMhA2Sm+jEg5qxFJREzReWc8aPQHwYDIenld1lILcD01s1dMuXw3v0s6P1MEL q6Jlplg0nX+qYwcd+vUgJ0+bAQMFSGopIsO2Rkii2uYzjbgo7NQLVxNGcDGD1ZTqfEpI l9Zmo1MfFz5wgXhCUB6Rm0YCB0pMvJ2sfOS8nWdMMqoku8mxxqo+LN+IXeTVYN+k08co ylaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fYcmY624lNkGuFKFGdgyXxwfE5QyiBxuT1wzA9VOpaI=; b=jsONUafstAU44h+X5nljZHLwMyyUKMKIw+uz/sgcWOwphProG3OaMfXCnBh1eYoOZL /sKUYJysVBGet4KNT5gwY5ZldBfRO5gm62ZsZMIj67W1VmWy9SiXBwwUZNZOh44BZaHH MH2CkyRStCf5cZAPyRLHplWjOOLzL5c7Cba1RaB/VvXn1yQREx5W9P7YQP8Y4C1LeWEY hkUg1SnXuehRCb0Sy0mDVpwWy6mrK7P0whWYMVAW9lXFlyRPI7MkQ7n495maKGasTOLj u1Ujhr6WQmNl3MnsDGGW/EDuWwwUR/JNGMA6p2yavtzVvjLDnfRycAILHtLrRGejCLys kPPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaosnOTf7R60GQqbzrtPlYj7cS+JrnchMPvdG4kedmpsjbr/QwJ Nvjlt5eeWA+/qmvVQtao/9c6eqbc3rj87VHwNkZrPgry X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL4aozbC+eRM0NVp0hVhaX2KLBJpVnadpNgPCh/DJOQW/LfHv5fV4kNJaZay3euydwm8EW9eK3hqz8Cden6kJE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:164c:: with SMTP id y12mr2547325iow.138.1588955344645; Fri, 08 May 2020 09:29:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <834ksrj62j.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31; envelope-from=joaotavora@gmail.com; helo=mail-io1-xd31.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249294 Archived-At: On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 7:26 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > As for Co-authored-by, this is IMO a borderline case: a change in the > commit log message does not necessarily mean you become a co-author. I don't think a newbie author would like to see a strange commit message under his name without warning (tho I'm guessing: noone has complained). > But it doesn't do any harm, so it's your call whether to use it in > such cases. I don't, FWIW. Got it. No Signed-off-by. But just so I understand, you're "borderline" on Co-authored-by if that is motivated by the commit message text. You're _not_ opposed to it if I add a comment to code, or change some detail, right? Because I'll do that sometimes, too. Though only for larger changes, and from those authors I request copyright assignments. Thanks, Jo=C3=A3o